[silver_lined_cloud]

So, how is Rodney? [img]smilies/wink.gif[/img]

[Scythe]

Wow, this thread hasn't changed hardly at all

[sum1]

We're still nuts.

[GACT16]

Hey, I just had a thought, I think, anyway, maybe Riley was only boring cause he was with Buffy. Maybe he would have been exciting or something had he been been with Angel. Like the first time they met the beat the crap out of each other imagine if they built a relationship out of that. KaBoom!

[REG]

what were we talking about last time?...

oh yeah. about whether there r more Spuffies than Bangels. the latter being true (that there r more Bangels, to my knowledge anyway)

and there would be no Spuffy without Angel.

b/c The Master made Darla
Darla turned Liam into Angelus
Angelus made Drusilla
Drusilla turned William into Spike.

[/end rant]

[Scythe]

Originally posted by M姧åç}{è® what were we talking about last time?... oh yeah. about whether there r more Spuffies than Bangels. the latter being true (that there r more Bangels, to my knowledge anyway) and there would be no Spuffy without Angel. b/c The Master made Darla Darla turned Liam into Angelus Angelus made Drusilla Drusilla turned William into Spike. [/end rant]

You got it right this time I do know that last time when you did it wrong it was a typo, there was no-way that you would have got it wrong on purpose You're so Buffy knowledgey

[REG]

but i didn't get it wrong last time. it's just that i didn't make myself clear enough and people misunderstood me.

[sum1]

Originally posted by M姧åç}{è® what were we talking about last time?... oh yeah. about whether there r more Spuffies than Bangels. the latter being true (that there r more Bangels, to my knowledge anyway)

My information says the contrary. But I have no intetntion of discussing it here, because number of B/Aers vs number spuffies is a potentially touchy subject matter.

Originally posted by M姧åç}{è® and there would be no Spuffy without Angel. b/c The Master made Darla Darla turned Liam into Angelus Angelus made Drusilla Drusilla turned William into Spike. [/end rant]

There'd be no modern evolved humans without our primitive less evolved ape like ancestors. And there'd be no B/A without The Master. Which means Buffy and Angel and B/Aers should be grateful to the Master and Buffy should have gotten involved with him instead of with Angel.

And like I said out on the old board, let's avoid real shipper debate/discussion. The difference between that stuff and safe joking about ships is that safe joking avoids making any or much real points and avoids the potentially touchier topics.

Discussion of how many spuffies there are versus B/Aers or the whole spuffy-is-because-of-Angel thing are both topics that could lead to things getting less pleasant. And with shipper debate, things can get real unpleasant real fast.

So please let's drop that kind of talk, before things get nasty.

[sum1]

Originally posted by M姧åç}{è® but i didn't get it wrong last time. it's just that i didn't make myself clear enough and people misunderstood me.

What you said was:

on a sort of side note. there would be no Spuffy if it weren't for Angel turning William into a vampire. did u ever think of that?!

[sum1]

Originally posted by GACT16 Hey, I just had a thought, I think, anyway, maybe Riley was only boring cause he was with Buffy. Maybe he would have been exciting or something had he been been with Angel. Like the first time they met the beat the crap out of each other imagine if they built a relationship out of that. KaBoom!

I wrote a parody on that theme, basing Riley/Angel on B/A and using a number of real B/A lines. It's kind of a parody of B./A. You can find it on this page:

http://www.fanforum.com/forums/showt...5&pagenumber=9

(Not posting the parody on this thread because I'm trying to avoid shipper conflict.)

[Scythe]

Originally posted by M姧åç}{è® but i didn't get it wrong last time. it's just that i didn't make myself clear enough and people misunderstood me.

So, this isn't getting it wrong last time?:

that's what i meant. and i never said that Angelus turned William into Spike. and just so we're clear: the master turned Darla, Darla turned Liam into Angelus, then he turned Spike, and finally Spike turned Drusilla

[REG]

nope, it isn't.

[Scythe]

Originally posted by M姧åç}{è® nope, it isn't.

So in which episode do we find out that Spike sired Drusilla?

[sum1]

Originally posted by M姧åç}{è® nope, it isn't.

Ok, you've got me confused here. I'm sorry, I just don't think I understand what you meant. So let me go over it and maybe you can explain to me what I'm missing.

You said:

on a sort of side note. there would be no Spuffy if it weren't for Angel turning William into a vampire. did u ever think of that?!

"Angel turning William into a vampire"
It was Drusilla who turned William into a vampire, not Angel(us).

Then later you said:

that's what i meant. and i never said that Angelus turned William into Spike.

"i never said that Angelus turned William into Spike"
But you did. Or maybe I just don't understand what you meant. To me "Angel turning William into a vampire" = "Angelus turned William into Spike".

You also said:

and just so we're clear: the master turned Darla, Darla turned Liam into Angelus, then he turned Spike, and finally Spike turned Drusilla

"Angelus, then he turned Spike"
That looks to me like saying Angel(us) turned William into the vampire Spike. Like I've said, he didn't -it was Drusilla who turned Spike.

"Spike turned Drusilla"
But he didn't. Angel(us) turned Drusilla and Drusilla turned Spike.

The Master turned Darla, Darla turned Angel(us), Angel(us) turned Drusilla and Drusilla turned Spike. Then later, in ATS season 2, Drusilla turned the human Darla back into a vampire.

So what did you mean? There must be something I'm misunderstanding.

[silver_lined_cloud]

Ack...all this is confusing me .

Tea, anyone?