Fan Forum
Remember Me?
Register

  Request a Forum   |     View New Forums

Closed Thread   Post New Thread
 
Forum Affiliates Thread Tools
Old 03-31-2015, 08:58 PM
  #256
Part-Time Fan
 
shonuff's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 256
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cristofle (View Post)
I'm caught somewhere between baffled and horrified, because there is no good option for this. Either Juliette and Avery need to have CPS called on them immediately because they never bother to reference their kid by name for the first few months of her life, or the show is going to go back and loop all their scenes which will look and sound RIDICULOUS. Literally, there is no option to this situation that is good.
In real life, a baby, particularly a first baby, probably doesn't need to constantly be addressed by name. It's not like you'd be saying, for example, "hey Bella, come over here"--you don't call her by name for her own benefit at first, and there's no other baby around that she needs distinguishing from unless she's at a daycare or the like. Parents would be more likely to say "don't wake up the baby" than "don't wake up Bella." and they may drag the "can't decide on a name" thing out for several episodes.
shonuff is offline  
Old 03-31-2015, 08:59 PM
  #257
Master Fan

 
jbshmdfb's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 24,236
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cristofle (View Post)
I'm still so horrified. There really is no possible way that the baby not already having a name in the script will play well. Either they didn't name her, or they reference/deal with their NEWBORN CHILD so rarely, she might as well be a new gerbil they got from the pet store (in order for them to either film the scenes four ways or even be able to go back and loop it). Frankly, I don't care about Juliette's comeback, or Avery's band difficulties, if they're ignoring their kid. They made the choice to have this child, and that should take more priority than referencing her name maybe once an episode.
It just shows the show has zero priorities in planning. Nothing new really
jbshmdfb is offline  
Old 03-31-2015, 09:00 PM
  #258
Extreme Fan
 
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 2,061
Quote:
Originally Posted by soapbubbles511 (View Post)
These writers are morons. Winter hiatus was the time for this poll. Then they'd have the results when they were writing the episodes
Exactly, it would have been a great idea to maintain buzz about the show during the ridiculously long winter hiatus by giving the fans something to think about rather than that stupid couple poll that of course had D/R and J/A first and everyone else had like 2%
TVFan221 is offline  
Old 03-31-2015, 09:05 PM
  #259
Master Fan

 
jbshmdfb's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 24,236
Quote:
Originally Posted by shonuff (View Post)
In real life, a baby, particularly a first baby, probably doesn't need to constantly be addressed by name. It's not like you'd be saying, for example, "hey Bella, come over here"--you don't call her by name for her own benefit at first, and there's no other baby around that she needs distinguishing from unless she's at a daycare or the like. Parents would be more likely to say "don't wake up the baby" than "don't wake up Bella." and they may drag the "can't decide on a name" thing out for several episodes.
they are naming the baby in 318. But won't be chosen by fans till they are filming the finale, that is the main issue for a few of us.
jbshmdfb is offline  
Old 03-31-2015, 09:12 PM
  #260
Fan Forum Star

 
Cristofle's Avatar

Moderator of ...
Mischa Barton
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 114,424
Quote:
Originally Posted by shonuff (View Post)
In real life, a baby, particularly a first baby, probably doesn't need to constantly be addressed by name. It's not like you'd be saying, for example, "hey Bella, come over here"--you don't call her by name for her own benefit at first, and there's no other baby around that she needs distinguishing from unless she's at a daycare or the like. Parents would be more likely to say "don't wake up the baby" than "don't wake up Bella." and they may drag the "can't decide on a name" thing out for several episodes.
This has never been the case with any of my friends/relatives who have children. IIRC, even between the episode where she's born and the next episode, there's a time jump of a few weeks, and there will probably be more after that. If they haven't named their child in several weeks, they shouldn't HAVE a child. I've never known caring parents to never reference their children by name. Names ARE important, and they're important immediately. Not in a few days, necessarily, but if you can't be bothered to mention your child's name more than once or twice in the first couple MONTHS of her life (or come up with one at all)- are you even seeing this baby as human, lol? Yes, people say "Don't wake the baby", but not PRIMARILY. I've NEVER known ANYONE who didn't regularly reference their baby by name irl.

I don't need to see the baby onscreen all the time. I really don't. That's a hassle. But I also don't give one flying eff about Juliette OR Avery's career if their newborn child is going to come off as afterthought onscreen, and that seems almost inevitable at this point, if she hasn't been named by the writers up to the point of writing the damn finale several episodes later. And I say this as a viewer who isn't even that invested in any characters BUT Juliette or Avery, but one thing I won't be blind to in my faves is crappy parenting.
__________________
What do you know of my heart, priestess?
What do you know of my sister?
icon: simply_ali
Cristofle is offline  
Old 03-31-2015, 09:24 PM
  #261
Part-Time Fan
 
shonuff's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 256
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cristofle (View Post)
This has never been the case with any of my friends/relatives who have children. IIRC, even between the episode where she's born and the next episode, there's a time jump of a few weeks, and there will probably be more after that. If they haven't named their child in several weeks, they shouldn't HAVE a child. I've never known caring parents to never reference their children by name. Names ARE important, and they're important immediately. Not in a few days, necessarily, but if you can't be bothered to mention your child's name more than once or twice in the first couple MONTHS of her life (or come up with one at all)- are you even seeing this baby as human, lol? Yes, people say "Don't wake the baby", but not PRIMARILY. I've NEVER known ANYONE who didn't regularly reference their baby by name irl.

I don't need to see the baby onscreen all the time. I really don't. That's a hassle. But I also don't give one flying eff about Juliette OR Avery's career if their newborn child is going to come off as afterthought onscreen, and that seems almost inevitable at this point, if she hasn't been named by the writers up to the point of writing the damn finale several episodes later. And I say this as a viewer who isn't even that invested in any characters BUT Juliette or Avery, but one thing I won't be blind to in my faves is crappy parenting.
But just because the VIEWERS don't hear them call her by name doesn't mean they never DO it. It's a TV show, so we're not assuming the snippets we get are the only interaction they are having with their baby, right? On screen, the few times they are likely to refer to her in the few scenes we get that have reference to her in them, they could get away with a few references to "the baby". I don't think we can infer a lifetime of crappy parenting from this. How about "my daughter"? That's another way to refer to her without saying a name. I'm just saying I don't think it's that hard a workaround.
shonuff is offline  
Old 03-31-2015, 09:24 PM
  #262
Master Fan

 
soapbubbles511's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 12,697
Oh I'm fine with not actually seeing the baby 99% of the time. She can be offscreen asleep or with the nanny or whatever while Juliette and Avery be mostly talking about/doing other things. But even still I don't understand not using the poor kid's name for like 3 episodes
__________________
Cause time is the worst kind of friend
Always there till you need it, then gone in the end
Oh but love is stronger than it, love is stronger than it
Sarah [youtube]
soapbubbles511 is offline  
Old 03-31-2015, 09:27 PM
  #263
Fan Forum Star

 
Static Waves's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 116,490
Quote:
Originally Posted by soapbubbles511 (View Post)
These writers are morons. Winter hiatus was the time for this poll. Then they'd have the results when they were writing the episodes
this is what I don't understand. That would have been the perfect time for this poll (esp when people were complaining about the fact that Juliette had nothing to do. Distracting fans with a Juliette related poll might have eased the blow there).

I want to believe that Deb is lying and it's rigged (and I partially don't believe her tbh. I still think it is rigged to one name). Because parents not referring to their child by their name is a whole new level of horrible parenting.
__________________
"That’s not just a series of coincidences. It’s destiny. And I never doubted you were mine.
And never doubt that all I want, forever and always, is for you to be happy."[Jane x Michael]
Static Waves is offline  
Old 03-31-2015, 09:29 PM
  #264
Fan Forum Star

 
Cristofle's Avatar

Moderator of ...
Mischa Barton
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 114,424
I think if she has no name in the script up to five episodes later, it IS that hard of a workaround. I expect babies to rarely actually BE onscreen. It's a pain in the ass to film with babies. I do not expect them to only mention their child's name once or twice an episode. That's not acceptable behavior from new parents. It's just not. If those are the only snippets of their lives/parenting we get, Juliette and Avery will look incompetent at best and uncaring at worst.
__________________
What do you know of my heart, priestess?
What do you know of my sister?
icon: simply_ali
Cristofle is offline  
Old 03-31-2015, 09:33 PM
  #265
Loyal Fan
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 1,101
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cristofle (View Post)
I think if she has no name in the script up to five episodes later, it IS that hard of a workaround. I expect babies to rarely actually BE onscreen. It's a pain in the ass to film with babies. I do not expect them to only mention their child's name once or twice an episode. That's not acceptable behavior from new parents. It's just not. If those are the only snippets of their lives/parenting we get, Juliette and Avery will look incompetent at best and uncaring at worst.
OMG really this is a tv show so i doubt they will be doing the same thing they do in real life babies tend to fall to the background after the initial joy of having them i can't remember the last time snow or charming mentioned neal on ouat to be honest i don't think any show mentions there kids until they are old enough to have s/l of there own so i don't expect to hear her talk about her 24/7 the way she would in real life
samantha24 is offline  
Old 03-31-2015, 09:34 PM
  #266
Fan Forum Star

 
Cristofle's Avatar

Moderator of ...
Mischa Barton
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 114,424
Quote:
Originally Posted by Static Waves (View Post)
this is what I don't understand. That would have been the perfect time for this poll (esp when people were complaining about the fact that Juliette had nothing to do. Distracting fans with a Juliette related poll might have eased the blow there).

I want to believe that Deb is lying and it's rigged (and I partially don't believe her tbh. I still think it is rigged to one name). Because parents not referring to their child by their name is a whole new level of horrible parenting.
Dude, Tammi, I cannot even. I was saying this elsewhere, but I had a client (I have a part time job as a pet sitter) who almost never referenced his dog by name. Every time he booked a visit, every time he called or texted (which was rare other than booking the visit unless I contacted him), every note he wrote me with instructions, he only ever called her "the dog". "Feed the dog this". "Take the dog out at this time". "Don't give the dog treats". "Don't play fetch with the dog longer than X minutes". I think I can count on one hand the number of times he actually referenced this poor dog (who was very sweet, and her name was Anna, lol) by her name, in the year or so I worked for him. I HATED THIS GUY SO MUCH, I can't even speak of it, it still makes me so mad. And this was a DOG, not a human being. WTF kind of new parents don't mention their child's NAME more than once in a blue moon? What in the....?
__________________
What do you know of my heart, priestess?
What do you know of my sister?
icon: simply_ali
Cristofle is offline  
Old 03-31-2015, 09:41 PM
  #267
Master Fan

 
jbshmdfb's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 24,236
Quote:
Originally Posted by Static Waves (View Post)
I want to believe that Deb is lying and it's rigged (and I partially don't believe her tbh. I still think it is rigged to one name). Because parents not referring to their child by their name is a whole new level of horrible parenting.
If it is rigged can it be rigged to be Cadence I know Bella is the popular one right now but I can't stop thinking of twilight and of dogs with that name It's not a bad name at all though, just overused because of twilight.
jbshmdfb is offline  
Old 03-31-2015, 09:43 PM
  #268
Fan Forum Star

 
Static Waves's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 116,490
I just refuse to believe that the writers are actually this dumb to not have new parents refer to their child by name for three episodes. That's like... cruel.
__________________
"That’s not just a series of coincidences. It’s destiny. And I never doubted you were mine.
And never doubt that all I want, forever and always, is for you to be happy."[Jane x Michael]
Static Waves is offline  
Old 03-31-2015, 09:45 PM
  #269
Fan Forum Star

 
Cristofle's Avatar

Moderator of ...
Mischa Barton
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 114,424
Quote:
Originally Posted by Static Waves (View Post)
I just refuse to believe that the writers are actually this dumb to not have new parents refer to their child by name for three episodes. That's like... cruel.
If she still has no name, at best she'll be referenced by her name like...once an episode for at least three episodes after she's born. Because some of this they've already filmed, and if they have to back in and edit in her name, they can't do that more than once or twice. And if she's that much of an afterthought to them, they shouldn't have had this kid :/
__________________
What do you know of my heart, priestess?
What do you know of my sister?
icon: simply_ali
Cristofle is offline  
Old 03-31-2015, 09:49 PM
  #270
Part-Time Fan
 
shonuff's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 256
Quote:
Originally Posted by Static Waves (View Post)
I just refuse to believe that the writers are actually this dumb to not have new parents refer to their child by name for three episodes. That's like... cruel.
Do you really think that there will even be occasion for them to be talking about her on screen that much? If that's what we WANT them to talk about, history shows it probably won't happen. I mean, I'd a lot rather hear Juliette talk about her daughter and say her name over and over than watch the "Luke Wheeler and his past, current and future finances, ex-wives and girlfriends show"...but...it's Nashville!
shonuff is offline  
Closed Thread   Post New Thread

Bookmarks



Forum Affiliates
Spoilers Guide
Thread Tools



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:40 PM.

Fan Forum  |  Contact Us  |  Fan Forum on Twitter  |  Fan Forum on Facebook  |  Archive  |  Top

Powered by vBulletin, Copyright © 2000-2024.

Copyright © 1998-2024, Fan Forum.