|
#1 | |||
Total Fan
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 7,533
|
Kevorkian Released From Jail
I was surprised to see there wasn't an article on this since I think Kevorkian's certainly an interesting and relevant person to discuss, especially since assisted suicide is legal in Oregon and is being voted on in California this week.
Quote:
I'm certainly pro-euthanasia, so I'm happy he's a free man. I know the family of one of his victims and they've been very supportive of him as well. __________________
Summer
Wenn man füreinander bestimmt ist, kann die Welt untergehen – aber man ist wenigstens zu zweit. Lieber gemeinsam ertrinken, als alleine verbrennen. |
|||
|
#2 | |||
Master Fan
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 12,875
|
I'm personally incredibly wary of assisted suicide/euthanasia. I think it's too dangerous.
__________________
(i do not know what it is about you that closes
and opens;only something in me understands the voice of your eyes is deeper than all roses) e. e. cummings - somewhere i have never traveled |
|||
|
#3 | |||
Master Fan
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 20,923
|
I'm for euthanasia if the person wants it. I don't want it to be like "The Giver" or something and kill the old just to kill them or something like that. And I think there should be strict laws concerning it, but I don't think it's an entirely bad thing.
__________________
LJ | News & Politics | Battlestar Galactica | TS2 | PS Watch Battlestar Galactica every Friday at 10pm! [/B] |
|||
|
#4 | |||
Total Fan
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 7,533
|
I definitely agree that there should be strict laws for it, but I definitely don't think it should be illegal. Like with Kevorkian, his clients were terminally ill and for the most part, in chronic pain as well. These aren't people who are just struggling with a bout of depression that if they get over, everything will be better. In a way, I think it's a "safe" thing, which is kind of messed up since the goal is death, to have people who can legally assist someone who wants to die. But there are drugs like morphine that people can overdose on and if administered right, there aren't really any side effects, and this way there aren't botched attempts.
__________________
Summer
Wenn man füreinander bestimmt ist, kann die Welt untergehen – aber man ist wenigstens zu zweit. Lieber gemeinsam ertrinken, als alleine verbrennen. |
|||
|
#5 | |||
Banned
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 4,893
|
I think Dr. Death got off pretty light. I saw him on Larry King last night and it said he had helped kill over 130 people. I think it's a slippery slope on the whole assisted suicide thing. It's still murder even if the person agrees to do it. Dr. Death should have gotten life in my opinion. Doctors are suppose to help save people, not kill them. Common sense.
|
|||
|
#6 | |||
Master Fan
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 20,923
|
I wouldn't say doctors are here to help "save" people, but to help them. If the person wants help to die, why not?
__________________
LJ | News & Politics | Battlestar Galactica | TS2 | PS Watch Battlestar Galactica every Friday at 10pm! [/B] |
|||
|
#7 | |||
New Fan
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 26
|
Wow, I had no idea he was released ..
|
|||
|
#8 | |||
Total Fan
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 7,533
|
Quote:
__________________
Summer
Wenn man füreinander bestimmt ist, kann die Welt untergehen – aber man ist wenigstens zu zweit. Lieber gemeinsam ertrinken, als alleine verbrennen. |
|||
|
#9 | |||
Banned
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 4,893
|
How do we know that all of Dr. Death's patients or victims wanted to die? Couldn't it be possible that some of them may have wanted to live but Dr. Death just had to get a fix and decided to take one of his patients' lives? Kevorkian comes off as one of those people who gets high off killing people.
Horses and dogs are different from human beings. They usually don't live in their 70s either. Putting someone out of their misery isn't always the best thing. Besides, some people may want to continue to live even if they're in pain and misery ever day. Dr. Death played God in a way and he took away people's free will and their will to live. He was probably very convincing and manipulative toward his victims. Like I said before, doctors are suppose to save lives not end them. |
|||
|
#10 | |||
Addicted Fan
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 4,354
|
I am pro killing the people if they want to die. But people and the family don't really know if they want to die. Dr. Death could have killed the people when the victim didn't want to die. I still think that Dr. Death got off too lightly. After killing all those people, he should have spent more time in jail.
__________________
April Icon by zabexelith @ lj Will: Money can't buy you love but money can buy you stuff and I LOVE STUFF! |
|||
|
#11 | |||||
Master Fan
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 20,923
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
LJ | News & Politics | Battlestar Galactica | TS2 | PS Watch Battlestar Galactica every Friday at 10pm! [/B] |
|||||
|
#12 | |||
Banned
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 4,893
|
All I'm saying is that I would not trust Dr. Death at all. I definately wouldn't want him looking after any of my relatives or friends. The man cannot be trusted. How do we know that he did not coerce or manipulate a lot of his victims into thinking they were terminally ill and could not be saved? It's possible to think that.
Dr. Death is a murderer and I believe his conviction proves that. He has taken dozens of people's lives. It doesn't matter if some of them wanted to die. It's still murder. And I'm sure Kevorkian may have gotten some of his victims to give permission when they were not in a clear state of mind. |
|||
|
#13 | |||
Total Fan
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 7,533
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
Summer
Wenn man füreinander bestimmt ist, kann die Welt untergehen – aber man ist wenigstens zu zweit. Lieber gemeinsam ertrinken, als alleine verbrennen. |
|||
|
#14 | |||
Obsessed Fan
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 5,440
|
i'm one of the people who thinks it should be allowed if the person is in intense pain and there is no chance of him/her surviving the illness getting healthy again. For me, it's kinda similar to how family members have the option of taking another member off of life-support if the machines are the only things keeping the patient alive.
__________________
"When you consider things like the stars, our affairs don't seem to matter very much, do they?"-'All the Bright Places' by Jennifer Niven
|
|||
|
#15 | |||
Banned
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 4,893
|
Indiansummer, I have heard of Kevorkian. I have seen him many times on 60 Minutes and other news magazines. He cannot be trusted. His uses his power of authority to committ crimes. He should not be able or allowed to play God.
It's joke that he was paroled. The courts should have given him life or the dealth penalty in my opinion. Besides, what if some of his patients/victims had changed their minds about the decision to end their lives? The man should not be allowed to help people kill themselves. It's highly unethical for a doctor and definately immoral for a person to do. Taking a person off life support is completely different than what Dr. Death did. In most cases, people on life support have either no hope or very little hope of ever recovering. With terminally ill people, there is always a chance they may overcome their illness or that there was a misdiagnosis. I believe recently there was a case in which a man was told he was going to die in less than a year and he went on a spending spree then found out he was perfectly fine. |
|||
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | |
|