|
#1 | |||
Total Fan
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 7,812
|
Steroids in Sport: Usage, Testing and Ramifications
Steroids in sport, namely baseball, has been raging in the last few months as a hot topic of discussion. As usage becomes more rampant and blatant without adequate testing, all levels of sport and even the United States federal government and Olympic committee have voiced their collective opinions.
Should usage be permitted as a "medical advance", or prohibited as an unnatural and unfair advantage? Should testing be more stringent? Should steroids be declared as a greater health risk, on par with other drugs, than they currently are? What do you think? I'll start it off with an interesting ESPN article penned by an anonymous veteran MLB player who is sick and tired of steroids in baseball. __________________
"Perception is reality." unknown
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
|
#2 | |||
Master Fan
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 11,627
|
Great article! After reading it, I’m very curious as to its author. A lot of interesting details were dropped that could help pinpoint who it might be. I’m guessing maybe Frank Thomas.
In my opinion, steroids, and any precursor for that matter, should be prohibited from ALL sports. Usage provides an athlete with an unfair advantage over other players, not to mention it completely taints the sport. MLB needs to get with the times and stop giving baseball players every reason to take steroids (ridiculous testing policies, light penalties, mega-dollar contracts, and great exposure). Unfortunately, I don’t see that happening anytime soon. For all of Bud Selig’s bravado, I’m sure he would prefer to keep this issue under wraps since offensive production is a fan attraction, and he knows full well that much of the late-90’s homerun burst was a result of guys using the juice. The HR is what draws a lot of people into the game. That’s no secret. Therefore, it was no surprise when guys would show up to spring training the following year having added 30 lbs. of “muscle.” Yeah, right! I’m sure that was natural. As for other sports, I apply the same line of thinking. The use of steroids creates an unfair competitive advantage and lack of a level playing field. It’s a form of cheating. Testing needs to become more stringent, with penalties being a lot more severe. IMO, an athlete found guilty of using steroids should be banned from their sport for a year. If they are a second-time offender, for life. Rules need to be established that will make players think twice, especially in regards to the serious health risks using steroids poses. I think that would send a serious message. __________________
"Government, even in its best state is but a necessary evil; in its worst state an intolerable one."
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
|
#3 | |||
Total Fan
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 7,812
|
Too tired to give a proper reply right now, so I'll leave you with this to hold you over. [img]smilies/tongue.gif[/img]
Quote:
__________________
"Perception is reality." unknown
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
|
#4 | |||
New Fan
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 11
|
Quote:
__________________
Get of the drugs now, ya hear.
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
|
#5 | |||
Total Fan
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 7,812
|
My guess was going to be Curt Schilling, even before he decried baseball as being untrustworthy. Before anyone says I'm a bandwagon jumper, I point to Schilling's nature of being outspoken, most recently (before this) against the Questec system.
All steroids and precursors should indeed be banned from all levels of baseball. At this point, I'd argue that the taint of steroids is so prohibitive that the excitement of having more home runs has been overshadowed. I would prefer a 3-strike system (yes, cue the laughter); 1st = 1 month suspension, 2nd = 1 year, 3rd = life, with chance for re-instatement after 5 years based on volunteer anti-drug awareness program participation. __________________
"Perception is reality." unknown
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | |
|