[jediwands]

Originally Posted by stlavin95 (View Post) That's an ridiculous long wait for S5.

Isn’t it? Maddening.

[stlavin95]

Originally Posted by The Apt (View Post) Lol I’m sure you’re right.

Probably haha

[stlavin95]

Originally Posted by The Apt (View Post) Isn’t it? Maddening.

It really is, which sucks.

[jediwands]

Originally Posted by stlavin95 (View Post) Probably haha

Yep, lol.

[jediwands]

Originally Posted by stlavin95 (View Post) It really is, which sucks.

The CW simply doesn't care about quality very much. It is not their biggest concern. It's incredible. The 100 is almost too smart for their network, just like Everwood was.

[stlavin95]

Originally Posted by The Apt (View Post) Yep, lol.

Lol

[stlavin95]

Originally Posted by The Apt (View Post) The CW simply doesn't care about quality very much. It is not their biggest concern. It's incredible. The 100 is almost too smart for their network, just like Everwood was.

Makes sense considering they dragged out One Tree Hill for 3 more seasons than they should have haha

[jediwands]

Originally Posted by stlavin95 (View Post) Makes sense considering they dragged out One Tree Hill for 3 more seasons than they should have haha

Absolutely, lol. All because it was the right flavor/target audience.

[stlavin95]

Originally Posted by The Apt (View Post) Absolutely, lol. All because it was the right flavor/target audience.

Well that and it was still one of their better ratings shows.

[jediwands]

Originally Posted by stlavin95 (View Post) Well that and it was still one of their better ratings shows.

You should have seen Everwood's ratings... they were way better than One Tree Hill's. It didn't matter though.

Everwood

4.8
4.6
4.3
3.6 (and this had to do with changing nights and times in an attempt to lower the ratings)

One Tree Hill

3.5
4.3
2.8
2.9
2.7
2.8
2.3
1.8
1.9

=

Everwood clearly winning the battle of quality, AND ratings.

But it didn't matter to the CW.

[stlavin95]

Originally Posted by The Apt (View Post) You should have seen Everwood's ratings... they were way better than One Tree Hill's. It didn't matter though. Everwood 4.8 4.6 4.3 3.6 (and this had to do with changing nights and times in an attempt to lower the ratings) One Tree Hill 3.5 4.3 2.8 2.9 2.7 2.8 2.3 1.8 1.9 = Everwood clearly winning the battle of quality, AND ratings. But it didn't matter to the CW.

Wow, but OTH was still beating out Gossip Girl when that show was promoted so much better.

[jediwands]

Originally Posted by stlavin95 (View Post) Wow, but OTH was still beating out Gossip Girl when that show was promoted so much better.

Exactly. OTH was still one of the higher rated shows but you can only imagine how pissed Everwood fans were seeing all these other shows being taken knowing we had the quality AND the ratings. VM had the quality but terrible ratings. However, Dawn was biased and took that show.

[stlavin95]

Originally Posted by The Apt (View Post) Exactly. OTH was still one of the higher rated shows but you can only imagine how pissed Everwood fans were seeing all these other shows being taken knowing we had the quality AND the ratings. VM had the quality but terrible ratings. However, Dawn was biased and took that show.

Why was she biased?

[jediwands]

Originally Posted by stlavin95 (View Post) Why was she biased?

It was on her network at the time, UPN, so she was trying hard to take as many shows on that network that she could.

[stlavin95]

Originally Posted by The Apt (View Post) It was on her network at the time, UPN, so she was trying hard to take as many shows on that network that she could.

What shows did she end up keeping?