JJH85

I don't know that much about it, but most people are RH Positive. I found out when I was trying to get pregnant because I am O Negative and my hubby is O Positive which can be harmful to the fetus, so I had to get monthly shots during pregnancy and after giving birth.

LWS53

I think they would have told me if I was RH neg when I was pregnant. I must have been told my blood type but can't remember it. I know my mother is O positive because she told me and I have a feeling my dad was A.

JJH85

We kind of got a little OT didn't we? How come we do that?

LWS53

Well it started off about Josh and ended up about us - we don't even know for sure whether he is RH neg.

I'll find a little Josh thing to put us on topic. Useful hands.

JJH85

Such a little thing that creates all kinds of big feelings.

Caledon

Lesley, Didn't you mention that you had Irish ancestry at some point in the past?. The traits can be carried by one or both parents. Two recessive genes carried by either parent BUT happen to be RH POSITIVE by birth lead to an Rh neg kid. Sorry if I'm going off topic but this is why I think Josh is a neg. His mother is Irish and his dad depending on what ancestry he stems from can easily be a genetic carrier if he has Scottish, Irish, Basque or Scandanavian blood therefore leading Josh to be Neg.

The RH negative bloodline came in around 35 thousand years ago and scientists CANNOT explain 100% where it originated from. Either we are classified as a "mutation" or the theory goes it was introduced from an "outside" source most likely some would say extraterrestrial or if you happen to be religious, look up the Bible under "angels and nephilim" and that's us!.Steering back on topic though..
However, and I'm trying to make this as less complicated as possible, so bear with me, I prefer the third theory of us being a genetically similar but DIFFERENT species. Science seems to back this up from what I have researched. A quote from the latest scientific paper found online (these things happen not to be made public or mainstream surprisingly enough), says..

"The case control for RHD negative subjects have reported more frequent allergic, digestive, heart, haematological, immunity and mental health and neurological concerns. Incidences of various disease also differ from Rh neg to Rh positive subjects. From a medicinal, clinical point of view, Rhd negativity COULD represent a serious problem".

I could quote the report name but suffice to say thanks to "Charles University" in PRAGUE for that one.
I can't stress enough that if you are RH neg or if you suspect you are. Get yourself tested for your blood and look into this stuff. It really is important especially for both sexes and fertility. They say in order to avoid "fertility" complications that both RH factors should be the same (they used to test prospective partners for this in the past regarding children and marriage. Rh neg was only discovered in 1940 believe it or not but we have been here for a long time unnoficially!) women especially but more needs to be researched on RH NEG MEN as well.

You can ask me more questions or research it online. Thanks for listening and sorry for rabbiting on!. Just wanted to clear it up.

So if I wail on about the Josh/Diane baby thing then DON'T for goodness sake knock what I'm saying. If Josh does read any of this stuff then I hope he has sense to look into this or take the RH consideration into any family he decides to have.

It is that important and I hate that no-one is taught any of this background stuff and people need to know both RH POSITIVE AND NEGATIVES alike not just on this forum but in the wider world out there.

LWS53

I will answer this in the ot thread.

LWS53

What did I say about his hands?

JJH85

Nothing needs to be said about his hands. There are just no words

LWS53

And the look of love on his face.

JJH85

Ooops, I got distracted by the hands. Had to go back to have a look at the rest.

LWS53

How can one man look so different in two roles. He just looks like a different person as Peter than he does as Cole. Great acting in both parts.

JJH85

That is one of the things I love about him. You can watch him in any role and see a different person, that is how talented he is. I don't feel the same way about some of the "A-List" actors out there (ie. Johnny Depp, he's the same in almost every role)

LWS53

I really like Johnny Depp - but he is a totally different type of actor than Josh. I would love to see them working together.

JJH85

Ooops, sorry, didn't mean to diss on JD.

*******************************

One of the little things that I love about Josh is how he is in his onscreen relationships.