Thanks for the new thread. :)
Quote:
Originally Posted by izziejames
(Post 20847877)
I just fundamentally disagree with this. He's not, otherwise Carrie wouldn't be able to kiss him or get in the shower with him. He's not laying down the law, he's not telling her what's what until she kisses him. IMO, he never should have let it get that far.
|
Aside from firing her (I still want an explanation for why he doesn't do that) the options are fairly limited, and he's obviously taking the standard Nathan tack of ignoring it in the hope that it goes away - which hasn't worked once, but he still tries anyway. I should talk to Mark about that...
Turning her away in the context I said it doesn't necessarily mean laying down the law, yelling at her, etc. It just means he's not encouraging her, and he's turning her advances away. Which he is; whether he's doing it harshly and clearly enough is certainly up for debate, but he is turning her down, mostly by simply ignoring her. In 5.07 he's giving her nothing except a muted, half-icy greeting. Anything she thinks she's getting beyond that is in her own head, because he isn't giving her anything. I also don't think Nathan's reaction to her would have much impact on the kiss and the shower incident, because regardless of Nathan's thoughts on the matter, she's forcing herself on him anyway. Short of firing her, which he definitely should have done, I doubt anything would prevent her from throwing her skeezy butt at him.
I just don't understand why two perfectly sane (if not exactly cognizant) people would keep around someone who is making them both uncomfortable.
I guess it's ironic, in a way. Nathan probably thinks he should let Carrie stay because Haley and Jamie love her; Haley, in turn, probably thinks she should let Carrie stay because she's overreacting, and Nathan and Jamie both get along well with her. If Nathan and Haley would just talk to each, they'd realise that the wires have been seriously crossed somewhere along the line.
I just really, really hate the D word in this storyline. On top of everything else, it's one more kick in the teeth; there are so many ways for the characters to be angry and hurt without resorting to that for dramatic effect.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Maud&Danny
Last thread we were debating about whether Haley has the right to ask Nathan for a divorce even if she is angry and don't think straight about what she's saying.
|
If you're talking about the last few posts, my comments weren't about that at all. They were about how hurt Nathan would be by it, and how fair it is to him when he's also a victim, regardless of whether Haley has good reason for doing it. The two aren't mutually exclusive: it's possible to agree that Haley has reason for thinking what she does, and for reacting the way she does, without being of the opinion that Nathan deserves it or that it's fair to him. :shrug: