|
I guess I m not the best person to share her ideas on this topic, considering guns are generally prohibited in Europe and it has been working fine for us, I just see a lot of pro-bearing guns arguments , centering around the right of the civilian to be able to protect himself if things go completely wrong. But here is where my logic fails. Don't organized societies have already their organs and means to do that, aka protect their civilians when things go wrong?i.e. police, justice system etc. And if those institutions aren't say working properly , isn't the next, logical step to establish better controls over them, enhance them and evolve them, and not to just arm the civilians instead?
My view on the matter isn't as simple, but sometimes I think that such a simple argument is enough to indicate the fallacy in pro-bearing guns opinion.
|