|
#16 | |||
Absolute Fan
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 6,565
|
Quote:
|
|||
|
#17 | |||
Senior Moderator Manager
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|||
|
#18 | |||
Absolute Fan
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 6,565
|
Quote:
With Enterprise, there is just so much they could have done in 4 seasons that they didn't do. |
|||
|
#19 | |||
Senior Moderator Manager
|
I think the writers finally started to understand that in the 4th season, with the arc about the Augments in particular.
__________________
|
|||
|
#20 | |||
Master Fan
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 16,870
|
Why ‘Enterprise’ Is Getting Another Look and Why You Should Give It a Chance Too
| Star Trek News | TrekNews.net
They make some interesting points __________________
- Martin
"Bob, you can't drive this like you do your average starship. You have to ramp up the reaction and then gently engage the nacelles or you'll overload the injectors and have to reinitialize!" "So...goose the throttle and then ease off the clutch or I'll kill it?""Pretty much. Yeah..." |
|||
|
#21 | |||
Extreme Fan
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 2,657
|
One argument that is partially correct is "Star Trek just didn’t seem as fresh as it used to in the early 1990s," but that was not a major reason for the failure to interest fans. The situation was exacerbated by churning out television shows for several years without a clear idea of where they were going and consistent storyline. Of course the shows "got old."
"New fans are discovering Trek for the first time through these movies (the new crap) and are primed in a sense to consume more stories within this universe." In other words; Enterprise failed because the story was bad, but it has a future because new viewers have never seen Trek pre-dating the new movies, and therefore, have no expectations for the show to meet. I find his reasoning dubious. __________________
Last edited by Ouyyir i'ch'Rihan; 04-04-2015 at 10:57 PM |
|||
|
#22 | |||
Senior Moderator Manager
|
Thanks for the link to the article Martin. I"ll have to read it later.
Personally, I thought Enterprise found it's footing in it's final season. __________________
|
|||
|
#23 | |||
Absolute Fan
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 6,565
|
One reason why Star Trek by the time of Enterprise wasn't as fresh as the early 1990s stuff is they had gone to the well too many times with movies and spinoff series. By the time Enterprise found its footing in its final season it was too late.
|
|||
|
#24 | |||
Master Fan
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 10,091
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|||
|
#25 | |||
Senior Moderator Manager
|
I think the season long chase after the Xindi lost them a lot of their fanbase in the third season.
ETA: Quote:
__________________
|
|||
|
#26 | |||
Master Fan
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 16,870
|
That would hurt any show.
__________________
- Martin
"Bob, you can't drive this like you do your average starship. You have to ramp up the reaction and then gently engage the nacelles or you'll overload the injectors and have to reinitialize!" "So...goose the throttle and then ease off the clutch or I'll kill it?""Pretty much. Yeah..." |
|||
|
#27 | |||
Extreme Fan
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 2,657
|
Usually American stations move shows around trying to find a time slot that increases viewers, so that is indeed a little unusual.
And that Xindi season must have been responsible for loosing quite a few viewers. Not a fact. Just an opinion based on my reaction to it. They obvious changed direction hoping it would increase viewers, but such a boring war that had nothing to do with the Trek universe stretched out over an entire season could not have helped with the show's popularity. __________________
|
|||
|
#28 | |||
Master Fan
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 10,091
|
Enterprise also had to deal with being broadcast in the final season that their network existed and had to also contend with the merge of their UPN network with WB's. CW network could only take so many series with them and Enterprise fell short in that regard.
__________________
|
|||
|
#29 | |||
Extreme Fan
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 2,657
|
I am completely ignorant of the current structure of American television. I have no idea what all those networks/channels are. It looks like 200 channels with nothing on has become 400.
__________________
|
|||
|
#30 | |||
Absolute Fan
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 6,565
|
You got that right.
|
|||
Bookmarks |
Tags |
scott bakula , star trek |
Forum Affiliates | |
Thread Tools | |
|