sourburst

Yes, but I still don't like Jamie in a dominant violent role. Like, having a fight with Jack is acceptable. But anything one sided, like doing what jack did to him back, would be OOC to me and wrong. If that makes any sense.

wickedrum

Sure.

Question: Do you think Jamie would kill him if Jack was helpless/unable to defend himself?

Donna723

Death would be too good for Jack! He needs torture! Oooh im violent tonight, but I just watched the end of season 1 (again). But no, I don't think Jamie would kill him if he was helpless.

wickedrum

Thanks! That's awesome of Jamie! So what do you think he would do with him?

sourburst

I don't think he would either

Heidsdk

I really a agree with you

Why dont u think Jamie would Kill him if he was defenceless?

sourburst

It's against his character's morals

Heidsdk

Yeah very true but what he have done to claire i Think Maybe he could?

wickedrum

To Claire? His greatest offences are against Jamie

wickedrum

My other question would be: do you think there would be any circumstances where Jamie would help Jack in some way?

sourburst

never

wickedrum

I'm basing the idea on Alex's death scene in the book. Because there was no stupid corpse bashing there (why show why why why), Jamie was present instead of Murtagh and displayed momentary sympathy towards Jack.

Heidsdk

i agree with this hehehe!!!!

and i still havent read the books

sourburst

You should definitely check them out at some point, or at least the first couple so you can compare them to the show

wickedrum

Dragonfly in Amber is a treasure!