[lancer1993]

'Lost' theory debunked: Richard Alpert NOT into eyeliner | PopWatch Blog | EW.com

Scott Patterson (Gilmore Girls/Saw IV and V) definitely does NOT wear eyeliner. He just has long, gorgeous eyelashes and mesmerizing eyes. *sigh* He needs to be back on television!

LOL weird.

[SPA]

Yeah, I read that too, Craig, and raised my eyebrows. It was an article where someone wrote about actors (including men) wear eyeliner and for guys it's called "guyliner". Then someone commented about the article saying that she loved Scott's eyes and thought that maybe he was using guyliner and hoped that he didn't -- that he just had beautiful, memerizing eyes. It put a grin on my face. Would Luke be caught dead wearing any type of makeup, much less "guyliner." (heehee)

[marythe]

Originally Posted by SPA (View Post) Marythe -- thank you for the link!! Are you from France?? Welcome to the wild and wonderful world of the Scott Patterson Forum. If you get a chance you might want to venture into our Introduction Thread and let us know a little bit about yourself. We look forward to reading your posts!!! ------ Marythe -- merci du lien ! Êtes-vous la France ? Bienvenue au monde sauvage et merveilleux du forum de Scott Patterson. Si vous obtenez une chance vous pourriez vouloir oser dans notre fil d'introduction et nous avez faits savoir un peu vous-même. Nous attendons avec intérêt de lire vos poteaux ! (I used an online translator -- I hope it worked properly)

Thank you for all the welcome no I'm not from France but from Switzerland and living in Melbourne Australia.

The translator is working properly

[Nogodsnomasters]

Quote: Scott Patterson (Gilmore Girls/Saw IV and V) definitely does NOT wear eyeliner. He just has long, gorgeous eyelashes and mesmerizing eyes. *sigh* He needs to be back on television!

*cough* That was from me, actually. I saw it yesterday and just had to clear the air.

[lancer1993]

Originally Posted by SPA (View Post) Yeah, I read that too, Craig, and raised my eyebrows. It was an article where someone wrote about actors (including men) wear eyeliner and for guys it's called "guyliner". Then someone commented about the article saying that she loved Scott's eyes and thought that maybe he was using guyliner and hoped that he didn't -- that he just had beautiful, memerizing eyes. It put a grin on my face. Would Luke be caught dead wearing any type of makeup, much less "guyliner." (heehee)

Out side of acting ITA!

*cough* That was from me, actually. I saw it yesterday and just had to clear the air.

Small world.

[SPA]

Originally Posted by Nogodsnomasters (View Post) *cough* That was from me, actually. I saw it yesterday and just had to clear the air.

Soooo funny. I should have known better, shouldn't I!!! Well done, NoGods. You are now a noted item when "googled"!!! It came to me as an e-mail from a google search. Craig is right -- small world.

[Tarty History]

I notice The Rogue is not listed on IMDb for Scott anymore. Does anyone know what happened?


ITA, NoGods. Scott's eyes are mesmerizing.

[SPA]

Originally Posted by Tarty History (View Post) I notice The Rogue is not listed on IMDb for Scott anymore. Does anyone know what happened? ITA, NoGods. Scott's eyes are mesmerizing.

I checked in IMDbPro and Scott is still listed as well as Costas Mandylor is "rumored" and the movie is listed as "in development" so to me that means it's still in the works, right?? -- there is hopefully some updated news later on this month -- couple more pieces to the puzzle. I wonder if the uncertainty of the actors strike has something to do with film production. Curious about IMDb though

[Tarty History]

Thanks for checking IMDbPro, SPA. I don't know what the difference is between "in development" and 'in production' as it was listed before. It's good to know The Rogue still exists; it sounded interesting.

[SPA]

No problem -- you are very welcome. I am hoping for some tidbits of news this month -- news is awfully dry at the moment.

So what's the order of getting a movie made??

In Development
Pre-Production
In-Production
Filming
Post-Production

I don't know the difference between Pre-Production and In-Production either. I think "In Development" means that people are thinking about the project but not yet committed to going forward.

[lancer1993]

Pre-Production is laying the ground work, getting actors, sets, locations then In-Production is the actual shooting of the movie so there normally isn't a separate Filming stage from all I've seen, but I might be wrong.

[SPA]

Originally Posted by lancer1993 (View Post) Pre-Production is laying the ground work, getting actors, sets, locations then In-Production is the actual shooting of the movie so there normally isn't a separate Filming stage from all I've seen, but I might be wrong.

Thanx Craig, for giving me the insight -- I was speculating a bit. I thought/think that I've seen both terms (In-Production and Filming) in IMDb, so maybe it's just them.

[SPA]

A friend of mine just recently saw the episode of the Canadian show "Being Erica" and she told me that the Scott Patterson in that episode was not our Scott. It's a younger, Canadian actor, she's sorry to report. IMDb made an error in its listing.

Also, there are some new pictures of Scott in Pure Element's MySpace -- no new news on Pink Ribbon though -- only that it's still plugging away. We are still awaiting news on the project that Scott is excited about. Hopefully soon (sooner the better for me).

[Pasadora]

Haha, omg. How cute are those pics. Thanks for letting us know, SPA.

[Alyss]

awwww XD those pics are cute!
the one she's using as her profile pic it's fantastic lol
thanks Deborah