|
#46 | |||
Moderator Support Team
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 71,563
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
|||
|
#48 | |||
Fan Forum Hero
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 75,163
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|||
|
#49 | |||
Master Fan
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 16,570
|
Quote:
|
|||
|
#50 | |||
Moderator Support Team
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 71,563
|
Quote:
|
|||
|
#51 | |||
Fan Forum Hero
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 54,234
|
I do casually like those ship so it does suck. I am glad not overly invested.
I am more disappointed she ruined the second A mystery. In the first two seasons I could go back and see how Mona did everything and in the books I can see how Ali, Mona, and Nick did everything. After s3 I can't see how Cece did everything |
|||
|
#52 | |||
Fan Forum Hero
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 54,234
|
sorry dp
|
|||
|
#53 | |||
Fan Forum Legend
|
Quote:
Sara Shepard has to be either laughing, pissed or a combination of both. She knows these characters and very well could be pissed at MK for pulling this sht. |
|||
|
#54 | |||
Moderator Support Team
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 71,563
|
Quote:
|
|||
|
#55 | |||
Fan Forum Legend
|
The more I think about it, the more it astounds me that this show is even allowed to still be on the air. It's just so offensive to everyone. Letting it get away with something problematic once is one thing, but this is constant, and it may look like it's one issue at a time, but the whole show is underpinned by subtle racism, or are we meant to ignore that every POC is either evil, killed off, or both?
|
|||
|
#57 | |||
Moderator Support Team
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 71,563
|
Quote:
|
|||
|
#58 | |||
Master Fan
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 14,124
|
I actually wouldn't include Dawson's Creek in the GG/OTH/90210 category, because DC dealt with it realistically. I loved Joey and Pacey to pieces, and couldn't stand Dawson, but when PJ got together that WB tagline "her choice changed everything" was actually true. Pacey and Dawson's friendship never truly recovered. That was realistic. The entirety of S4 was spent with resentment and bitterness between them. Pacey chose his love for Joey over his love for Dawson (which was the right decision!), but he didn't get to have both. Until the very last season when they're off in college we constantly see how that decision whether Pacey and Joey were even together at that time affected the PD friendship. They also flash-forwarded even further than PLL, and it was STILL awkward in the future.
That is what pisses me off so much about this current Spaleb/Haleb situation. Marlene wanted to do Spaleb for momentary shock, but she didn't want to deal with the actual consequences of it. She didn't want to reap what she sowed so to speak. Instead, she decided to have Hanna engaged (like that would somehow make it okay) and even worse encourage Spencer to follow her feelings. It is not realistic, and it makes Spaleb cheap and futile. It doesn't matter that the writers want to pull a teen soap move, and act like Hanna would be fine with this and Spencer/Hanna as well as Hanna/Caleb will eventually be back like it never happened. The fans remember. I can't look at Haleb or Spencer/Hanna the same again, because Hanna as the character they've written her would not be okay with this. And I'm sorry, but this isn't Spencer either. Spencer's "shopped out of Melissa's cart" because of her issues with Melissa, and their complicated relationship not because she's a serial boyfriend stealer. Spencer has always been a huge supporter of Caleb and Hanna being together, and is someone who always understood who Caleb was to Hanna, because Spencer has the same complicated feelings in regards to Toby. So, nope, even the writers trying it with the get out of jail free card basically laying this all on Hanna's door - ie. Hanna's engaged! Hanna said it was okay! Hanna is probably even the bad guy in the Haleb break up which I still think is baby related - doesn't make this any less damaging for Spencer as a character or the Spencer/Hanna friendship. The great thing about best friends, especially ones you've known your whole life, is that you build this implicit trust and a wordless language. You don't have to say that your exes are off limits, because your bff knows. Spencer getting herself in a situation where she developed feelings for Caleb is a betrayal. Spencer then putting that on Hanna is even worse. I keep seeing people say Hanna is engaged like that somehow makes it all okay. Hanna's engagement does cover Caleb to an extent; although I think they did him and Haleb a great disservice by not having him at least mention Hanna/talk to Hanna himself before going there with Spencer. He and Hanna have claimed to still be friends so he should have at least communicated with her (not asked permission). Hanna's engagement means nothing in regards to Spencer though. It isn't selfish for Hanna to not want to see her first love and extremely serious post high school ex-boyfriend with her best friend. Emotions are complicated. Even if Hanna was over Caleb (which we've seen she's not) it still doesn't mean Spencer being with him wouldn't affect her. Spencer's not stupid, and she knows Hanna better than most. She knows acting and even having feelings for Caleb is wrong which is why she didn't go there, and wasn't the one to tell Hanna. Yet, she selfishly grasped at Hanna's words when as her bff she absolutely knows that it really isn't okay. Not to explore those feelings or to have even developed them in the first place. And please no one say you can't help who you fall for. You can actually, and you do this by removing yourself from a situation when you see it developing. Spencer's had these feelings for a while, apparently since Spain. Instead of stepping back from Caleb she dived in further, has spent tons of time in DC with him, and had him set up for a job at her company. It's a disrespect, and it is a million times worse since the writers clearly aren't going to have Spaleb be a real thing. If Spencer did this for true love (ala Pacey) and ultimately chose Caleb over Hanna, and accepted the damage to her relationship with Hanna then that would be one thing. But the writers are using Spaleb to cause pointless couple drama/media headlines, and completely sweeping the biggest issue under the rug - Spencer and Hanna's friendship will never be the same. (Not touching the Spoby issues, because honestly Spaleb doesn't apply to them, imo. Caleb/Toby's friendship for sure, but Spencer and Toby can only benefit from Spaleb since it looks like it will lead to Toby's jealousy and their feelings being revealed.) Quote:
Oh, and who's the world's most cardboard policeman? I feel like this show has so many options to choose from with that one. I immediately thought you meant Lorenzo (?), but then remembered Toby was a cop for a while. Either way, at least we can agree on that point. Quote:
Which leads me to my second issue with your argument, this isn't actually a triangle. 90210 and Dawson's Creek spawned three of the most successful and iconic triangles to ever have been on TV. You're right, whether you loathed Dylan/Kelly, Kelly/Brandon or Pacey/Joey (or the flip sides), you talked about it. It got you heated. It still brings back those memories for us viewers years later. I'll always hate Kelly Taylor. But what made those triangles iconic is that they were actually triangles. The writers played all the beats of them, and let them have real lasting affects. Brenda had her own Parisian love affair, but she was rightfully allowed to be furious at Kelly, and feel betrayed. Brenda's actions didn't give Kelly a free pass. Dylan choosing Kelly changed the show forever. Brenda and Kelly could never truly mend their friendship, and remained jealous of one another for the rest of the time. They were all also written to have been in love. Kelly loved Dylan (gag) so her choosing him over her friendship with Brenda made some sort of sense. Spencer has a crush on Caleb, but is fully aware she's still hung up on Toby. It makes Spaleb even more of a slap in the face to Hanna, and this show trying to use them as a few eps of drama makes them less than a triangle and no where near iconic. The same can be said for the Dylan/Kelly/Brandon triangle. It played out. It had the beats. Dylan and Brandon's friendship never recovered. It's iconic, because it was epic. Because we got all the drama we wanted from it. Same with DC like I posted above. Maybe what I hate most about Spaleb happening is that I feel like Marlene is trying to have her cake and eat it too. She wants the shock factor of them with the media talking about it, but she doesn't want the actual follow through. I feel cheated. If Spencer is going to hook up with Caleb then it should be dramatic with fireworks and real drama. Hanna should be allowed to have her "I hate you. Never talk to me again." moment ala Brenda Walsh. Her character is owed that, and so are the fans. Spaleb is too big of a leap to be a two episode plot point to cause jealousy in Hanna and Toby, and then moved on from. There should have been build up. We needed to see Toby/Caleb's friendship in action, and not just mentioned. We needed to see Caleb's side of things and much more from Spencer. Dylan/Kelly's affair affected all of their friends. I don't expect we will get much from Aria or Emily on this situation, and that sucks. There should be fights and drama, and things should be irrevocably changed. That is what makes a triangle iconic. It changes the fabric of the show, and the characters relationships with one another forever. Marlene isn't doing that though. She's acting like Caleb is just a random new love interest for Spencer that Hanna casually dated before. This is to ultimately protect the Spencer/Hanna friendship and the liars core 4 without having to actually deal with what's happened. And at the same time she's saying, but don't forget Haleb and Spoby are epic. They're endgame. Nothing has changed. I find it offensive and pointless to go there, but be too lazy to play it out. I'm not a fan of Spaleb, but I'd rather it be more fleshed out/taken more time than be used this way, and ultimately cheapen so many relationships in the process, and honestly the show as a whole. __________________
You know I'm always coming back to this place
I'm always gonna look for your face. ♥ |
|||
|
#59 | |||
Master Fan
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 16,570
|
Quote:
|
|||
|
#60 | |||
Elite Fan
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 47,017
|
90210 was actually meant to be about teen issues according to Aaron Spelling. That's why you didn't see a lot of relationship drama in the first season, which tackled suicide, drinking, body image, etc. Spelling had to argue with the Fox producers quite a few times over that. They didn't even want Brenda/Dylan to have sex unless it taught a lesson. But he wanted to teach young people different lessons over the seasons, and the network didn't, so yes, sometimes shows start straying away in new directions over time. It was meant to be more in the vein of Party of Five, but then season 3 was so highly-rated that the relationship drama stuck and 90210 fed off it. That's why I commended PLL for not doing that for five years.
However, these girls are adults now. And I'm sorry but Hanna dumping Jordan for Caleb is expected, Aria dumping Liam for Ezra is expected, etc. Taking two halves of two popular couples is unexpected and it mixes things up. Even if they do go back to the original four couples, it's still the boldest thing they've done in about two years. I never thought MK would do that. I wasn't shocked by Mona or Cece; I pegged them both. She shocked me with Spaleb and I don't think it's a bad schock. To me, it's an interesting twist that all the girls must react to. Spaleb hooking up will be remembered. It may not be an iconic triangle but it's something that can't be undone. It's a real test of a friendship and I kinda like that it's nothing that A did. Now they can either rebuild it as two friends or let it be strained for awhile. A shouldn't cause every problem for four women anymore but that doesn't mean two of them can't be adult enough to get over it. I'm not trying to downplay any of the four couples but I am trying to say that we need something new. What should change now that the girls are adults? I mean, how far do the books go? Are they 23 in those? __________________
icon |
|||
Bookmarks |
Tags |
pretty little liars , speculation , spoilers |
Forum Affiliates | |
Thread Tools | |
|