Do we think Luke ever paid Logan for that vineyard valentine necklace? I guess it doesn't matter since the whole thing has been forgotten. I've never seen that jewelry on either girl.

No she doesn't have her own room. She is using Jess' bed and space - no walls or anything. I don't really think that's a problem for April or otherwise she would have said something.

Whether it's a problem for her or not doesn't really matter in a custody case though. The court would (in real life, not necessarily GG) want her to have her own room.

It's interesting. If anyone brings up Luke's own role in his current unhappiness all of a sudden it's about that he's -- in YOUR words -- poor and dirty and that people like myself want to see him eviserated. Sorry, but that's quite the dramatic leap. (Besides, Luke isn't poor.)

Following your logic, if he didnt' screw things up with Lorelai, than Anna would never attempt to move April to NM? Damn. It's a wonder Liz and TJ havent' disowned him, the townies haven't burnt down the diner and April hasn't run away from SH yet.

Is it? He's a brick for years and years, then he goes and makes one mistake - for four months - OK, let's compare:

Rory drops out of school, misses a semester, and miraculously catches up with a few 6am early starts. (I actually blame the writers for so overlooking her storyline that she didn't even do summer school classes, but this is the plot we were given).

Logan and Rory break up and Rory resists his attempts to get back together - until Lorelai bales him out. They break up again, due to their own flaws - and their relationship is saved by the TV miracle of a dramatic accident producing a hospital bedside reconciliation. (Again, one can blame the writers - but still. puh-leese)

Lorelai keeps her mouth shut for those same months - as pointed out above - and gets the "consequence" of a new romance/marriage. That's not a consequence, it's a choice.

Christopher disappears and neglects his daughter for 22 years - only to reappear just in time to be rewarded with a millionaire's inheritance and the girl of his dreams.

All the characters are flawed, only one is getting the book thrown at him. I suspect it may be intended as TV manipulation to build audience sympathy - but oy, enough already. For viewers who didn't totally disown the guy for one four-month mistake, it's overload.

Still unclear if we're getting an actual custody case or more typical access proceedings. However. Let's see if the laws of France actually apply, then the ocntinuity fairy can move on to the family law of Connecticut.

All the characters are flawed, only one is getting the book thrown at him. I suspect it may be intended as TV manipulation to build audience sympathy - but oy, enough already. For viewers who didn't totally disown the guy for one four-month mistake, it's overload.

Is it? He's a brick for years and years, then he goes and makes one mistake - for four months - OK, let's compare:

Rory drops out of school, misses a semester, and miraculously catches up with a few 6am early starts. (I actually blame the writers for so overlooking her storyline that she didn't even do summer school classes, but this is the plot we were given).

Logan and Rory break up and Rory resists his attempts to get back together - until Lorelai bales him out. They break up again, due to their own flaws - and their relationship is saved by the TV miracle of a dramatic accident producing a hospital bedside reconciliation. (Again, one can blame the writers - but still. puh-leese)

Lorelai keeps her mouth shut for those same months - as pointed out above - and gets the "consequence" of a new romance/marriage. That's not a consequence, it's a choice.

Christopher disappears and neglects his daughter for 22 years - only to reappear just in time to be rewarded with a millionaire's inheritance and the girl of his dreams.

All the characters are flawed, only one is getting the book thrown at him. I suspect it may be intended as TV manipulation to build audience sympathy - but oy, enough already. For viewers who didn't totally disown the guy for one four-month mistake, it's overload.

I think he probably might have offered, and that Logan would have decilined. He might have gone back and given Logan a check for an aproximate amount which Logan likely never cashed.

I don't remember ever seeing the necklace Richard gave Emily for their vow renewal again either, though.

All the characters are flawed, only one is getting the book thrown at him. I suspect it may be intended as TV manipulation to build audience sympathy - but oy, enough already. For viewers who didn't totally disown the guy for one four-month mistake, it's overload.

All the characters are flawed, only one is getting the book thrown at him.

I think he probably might have offered, and that Logan would have decilined. He might have gone back and given Logan a check for an aproximate amount which Logan likely never cashed.

I don't remember ever seeing the necklace Richard gave Emily for their vow renewal again either, though.

Duck, Luke, duck!!

But seriously, Luke lost 'his' girl (partly because of his own faults, but it's not about that, what I'm trying to say) to his enemy (if I can call Chris that; he felt sorta threatened by him), his diner gets trashed, Anna wants to take April with her (and away from him); what else? Isn't Luke hurt enough?

Duck, Luke, duck!!

But seriously, Luke lost 'his' girl (partly because of his own faults, but it's not about that, what I'm trying to say) to his enemy (if I can call Chris that; he felt sorta threatened by him), his diner gets trashed, Anna wants to take April with her (and away from him); what else? Isn't Luke hurt enough?