Spoilers - Gilmore Girls Spoilers and Speculation #101 - Page 5

lemon tart · 11-21-2006, 12:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lilmelodie (View Post)

The funny thing is that it does explain most of it. lol. I love Kirk.

Yes it would, lol. But Logan would still have this utterly befuddled look on his face, of, huh, wtf?

Sandlynn · 11-21-2006, 12:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WandaRose (View Post)

Do you think that if Rory had answered Lorelai's "And this is what you want?....are you sure?" with "No, actually I'm not so sure" Lorelai would have told Rory to nevermind coming home and she shouldn't even think about trying again until she had her head on straight -- which means she had to be back in school with a job working at a paper? Come on. Lorelai was sitting at home praying the phone would ring. She was just happy to finally hear from Rory. She didn't honestly care about anything else. She wanted her relationship with her daughter back on track. Everything else was secondary. No doubt she was excited that Rory was going back to school and had gone out and got a job on her own, but if Rory was coming home still a bit mixed up, Lorelai would have accepted her with the same open arms as she did anyway.

We will never know, especially since Lorelai kept changing her tune, e.g. we'll triple-team her.... No, we'll leave her alone. In any event, Lorelai had a disappointed look on her face up to very late in the game, including Rory's birthday party, and Rory was the one who reached out only to have her mother hold back.

lorelaisgirl · 11-21-2006, 12:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cappuccino (View Post)

Bringing this over from the LL thread

charmed1NM · 11-21-2006, 01:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lorelaisgirl (View Post)

gilmorebrazil · 11-21-2006, 01:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lemon tart (View Post)

Yes it would, lol. But Logan would still have this utterly befuddled look on his face, of, huh, wtf?

He, and also, sudden, Logan's car could have some mecanic problem and Rory drag him to Gipsy...The poor guy would have a heart atack.

peachypeep · 11-21-2006, 01:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by charmed1NM (View Post)

Originally Posted by Saranoh (View Post)
I can confirm that the “big event” happening in February is NOT a Lorelai pregnancy.

**Katiegg108** · 11-21-2006, 01:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pimbolina (View Post)

I thought the "big event" happening was the L/C wedding.

But I'm glad Lorelai's not pregnant. So who is going to get married this time or maybe another pregnancy?

I don't think it's either. That was in reference to the event that MA teased us about a month or so ago about something huge happening in February.

charmed1NM · 11-21-2006, 01:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Katiegg108 (View Post)

I don't think it's either. That was in reference to the event that MA teased us about a month or so ago about something huge happening in February.

must be the divorce?

**Katiegg108** · 11-21-2006, 01:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by charmed1NM (View Post)

must be the divorce?

*please, oh please, oh please*

or LL getting back together or kissing or something suddenly...

or maybe it's about RL... hmm...

catkirk7 · 11-21-2006, 01:28 PM

Quote:

or maybe it's about RL... hmm...

Doubtful since it came from Ausiello.

Sandlynn · 11-21-2006, 01:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by catkirk7 (View Post)

Doubtful since it came from Ausiello.

That's right. He doesn't watch that part of the show. He "Sookies" it, right? Isn't that his infantile terminology?

lancer1993 · 11-21-2006, 01:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sandlynn (View Post)

That's right. He doesn't watch that part of the show. He "Sookies" it, right? Isn't that his infantile terminology?

Maybe Sookie's pregnant again, 'cause you know Jackson's just that good LOL

lorelaisgirl · 11-21-2006, 01:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by catkirk7 (View Post)

Doubtful since it came from Ausiello.

sad, but true. And yes, the "Lorelai not pregnant" spoiler got a woot/smile reaction from me.

ETA:

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sandlynn (View Post)

That's right. He doesn't watch that part of the show. He "Sookies" it, right? Isn't that his infantile terminology?

Yes, 'Sookie-ing' is the right (and infantile) term. I hate it when they use that word.

Craig, Sookie can't be pregnant with Jackson's child: he got that vasectomy, remember.

carolav · 11-21-2006, 01:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lancer1993 (View Post)

Maybe Sookie's pregnant again, 'cause you know Jackson's just that good LOL

uhmm, that couldn't happen. WAIT! that could be truth just if Sookie could have something with a new guy! Jackson got the vasectomy.

lancer1993 · 11-21-2006, 01:49 PM

Quote:

Craig, Sookie can't be pregnant with Jackson's child: he got that vasectomy, remember.

Yes but that won't stop Jackson's little swimmers LOL

ETA

Quote:

Originally Posted by carolav

uhmm, that couldn't happen. WAIT! that could be truth just if Sookie could have somehing with a new guy! Jackson got the vasectomy.

Harvey the new vegi guy!

And since when has facts got in the way of the good (or bad) SL!