Spoilers - Gilmore Girls S&S #144 ~ GG - Welcome To The Dark Side - Page 4

GGMinn · 01-22-2007, 08:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by caf

Adding my thanks to Ciaobella, little_earthquake, Saranoh, Cappucino for having the courage, and caring enough, to continue to post spoilers. We all know there are other spoiler sources who don't.

This is the sentiment that I find to be ridiculous in this thread. If people are jumping through hoops and walking on fire in order to gain status on the thread as a spoiler provider, it's not worth it. Especially if the spoilers turn out to be just a kernel (or two) of truth and a whole lot of fanwank.

gilmorebrazil · 01-22-2007, 08:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by notoutforawalk (View Post)

Grr. I don't want RL to break up. (Which means they probably will.)

You are not helping

Quote:

I doubt the TA thing will be that big of a deal. It's just a crush.

Okay, but this sl should have a point. If RL won't get engaged, the "crush on the TA" won't help to intensifying their relationship so it could drive them apart. Didn't DSR say in an interview that Rory would ponder if Logan is just a college boyfriend or more? So I spec this crush will move their relationship in a good or in a bad way.

notoutforawalk · 01-22-2007, 09:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gilmorebrazil (View Post)

You are not helping

Heh. I know. I am just suddenly became uber-frustrated with the lack of Rory SL tonight. And then I started thinking about how I was irrationally hopeful about LL last year and... yeah. I think I should probably ignore the boards for a little while and rewatch last nights BG. But, I'm a board addict, so I won't be doing that.

lemon tart · 01-22-2007, 09:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by notoutforawalk (View Post)

Heh. I know. I am just suddenly became uber-frustrated with the lack of Rory SL tonight. And then I started thinking about how I was irrationally hopeful about LL last year and... yeah. I think I should probably ignore the boards for a little while and rewatch last nights BG. But, I'm a board addict, so I won't be doing that.

Go watch Caprica! She is a sight to behold! And even Helo, who I actually liked in the episode.

But you're right, the scattershot quality to Rory's storyline all season has been frustrating. Made worse during the hiatus, I think. Because we got time to really think about just how scattershot it has been.

iamsher · 01-22-2007, 09:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saranoh (View Post)

I doubt the TA thing will be that big of a deal. It's just a crush.

An "intense" crush.

Quote:

Originally Posted by GGMinn (View Post)

This is the sentiment that I find to be ridiculous in this thread. If people are jumping through hoops and walking on fire in order to gain status on the thread as a spoiler provider, it's not worth it. Especially if the spoilers turn out to be just a kernel (or two) of truth and a whole lot of fanwank.

Saranoh · 01-22-2007, 09:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by iamsher (View Post)

An "intense" crush.

That doesn't mean that it's some deep romance.

iamsher · 01-22-2007, 09:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saranoh (View Post)

That doesn't mean that it's some deep romance.

Definitely doesn't. But, it does mean that Rory needs to perhaps break up with Logan and be single if she's capable of having "intense" crushes. Having a regular fangirl crush is one thing. An "intense" crush is completely different. For one, she should not string Logan along. I'd rather they break up than for her to string the poor guy along.

Perhaps that whole "Lorelai and Rory ending up alone" ending doesn't seem that far-fetched anymore.

gilmorebrazil · 01-22-2007, 09:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saranoh (View Post)

That doesn't mean that it's some deep romance.

But even if the TA doesn't correspond her "feelings", they could be enough to break RL. And MF already ended with their relationship shaken, I guess.

Sandlynn · 01-22-2007, 09:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saranoh (View Post)

I doubt the TA thing will be that big of a deal. It's just a crush.

For what purpose? To break them up of course, to create enough doubts to cause a split at the end of the season. I mean, don't you find this "crush," on some random guy, coming just now to be a little unbelieveable? Has Logan been ignoring her?

Quote:

That doesn't mean that it's some deep romance.

What does it mean then? What does intense mean? That modifier is very important. It must signify something. How do you show an intense crush as opposed to a regular old crush. She won't just be batting her eyelashes. That's not intense.

Quote:

Where is the set-up for Rory only having a career?

Evreything we've seen since the pilot has been the set up. Chilton, Yale, the insistence on being Christiane Amanpour.

Saranoh · 01-22-2007, 09:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by iamsher (View Post)

Definitely doesn't. But, it does mean that Rory needs to perhaps break up with Logan and be single if she's capable of having "intense" crushes. Having a regular fangirl crush is one thing. An "intense" crush is completely different. For one, she should not string Logan along. I'd rather they break up than for her to string the poor guy along.

Perhaps that whole "Lorelai and Rory ending up alone" ending doesn't seem that far-fetched anymore.

What one person defines as "intense" might not be what another person defines as "intense." I was told that it would be "intense," but that doesn't mean everyone will necessarily see it that way. JMO

seslavie · 01-22-2007, 09:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GGMinn (View Post)

This is the sentiment that I find to be ridiculous in this thread. If people are jumping through hoops and walking on fire in order to gain status on the thread as a spoiler provider, it's not worth it. Especially if the spoilers turn out to be just a kernel (or two) of truth and a whole lot of fanwank.

Perhaps you missed Jerry's post?

Quote:

Originally Posted by JerryD

I really want all the attacks on spoiler sources to stop right now. We’re all lucky that we have spoiler sources at all, and I, for one, really appreciate that fact that people are nice enough to provide us spoilers, so don’t bite the hand that feeds you. I also want the nasty back and forth comments that I’ve seen on these threads to stop as well. Thank you.

Seriously, if the reception they've sometimes received is considered "status", I'm sure they would just as soon do without it. Personally, I do appreciate all the tidbits they provide us.

FuzzyCerts · 01-22-2007, 09:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sandlynn (View Post)

For what purpose? To break them up of course, to create enough doubts to cause a split at the end of the season.

No one stays happy for long on this show, happy is not "good" drama.....

Sandlynn · 01-22-2007, 09:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saranoh (View Post)

What one person defines as "intense" might not be what another person defines as "intense." I was told that it would be "intense," but that doesn't mean everyone will necessarily see it that way. JMO

Okay. Well then, what do you define as intense? How could they demostrate intense as opposed to just admiring someone's looks and charming personality? Paris had an intense crush on Asher and look where it landed her.

seslavie · 01-22-2007, 09:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sandlynn (View Post)

What does it mean then? What does intense mean? That modifier is very important. It must signify something. How do you show an intense crush as opposed to a regular old crush. She won't just be batting her eyelashes. That's not intense.

Well, I have an "intense" crush on Brad Pitt. I'm pretty sure I would stutter in his presence.

I'm hoping that it's this type of crush that she has. My marriage has survived this crush just fine. We just celebrated our 25th wedding anniversary.

TheJSW · 01-22-2007, 09:35 PM

Damsel, seriously, do you want me to respond as condescendingly to you? You are more analytical? It's called PARTICIPANT OBSERVERATION. Look it up. I am as analytical as the next poster. I simply refuse to look at everything through the prism of ME. There's more to this story than how I feel about it. JJs and LLs never seem to see that...no matter how many state as much. Again, I do not doubt, that Rory and her father have talks. If you would maybe read one of my post. You would have noticed that this is a theme that I have been on for over a year. Yes, they have to deal with things, but Rory has never been written from the prism of YOU or I. To see her as such...miss very much a part of analytical thinking that I refuse to give up to make anyone happy in this forum or in life.

Caf, no, the generalizations stay until they are proven inaccurate. I see so many differences, that it amazes me how two fans of this show. Who are fans of a different ship could see this show so SO so differently. It's a difference that leads to more antagonism than anything else. Sure, it's not intended, but I am not a bunny emoticon person. I never get JJ jokes. Neither do a lot of people. Nevertheless, until they are proven wrong, then they are going to be that way. Of course, you do not even consider yourself a part of the people you roll with...how perplexing is that?

ETA: So the spoiler SOURCE viewed it as INTENSE. Yet, the spoiler source, could give two ****s about TYPE-0 (If you are not watching Eureka 7...), and take the FACTS of the STORY and TWIST THEM. Huh. Perplexing...isnt it?

Nevertheless, I stand by my earlier spoiler, that all of you ignored. THERE ARE NO VIABLE RORY AND LOGAN SPOILERS. They are on LOCKDOWN. No one knows anything from what I have been told. That's a spoiler...yo.