|
#301 | |||
Cardcaptor Queen
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 42,069
|
Man of Steel is the only Superman film I saw, feel that one gets too much hate too. I thought it was a good movie *shrugs* I forgot about Sin City, I like both films. The sequel got shredded but I liked that one too, even though the first is better. I wish they would do more Sin City films after hearing about all the different stories but after the sequel bombed so badly I'm not expecting it. If that wasn't the case I wouldn't want to wait another ten years for a third one smh.
|
|||
|
#302 | |||
Fan Forum Legend
|
Quote:
__________________
In Loving Memory of Christine Dettloff(cheekymonkey503). Rest In Peace, Dear Cheekymonkey. ~ Alex |
|||
|
#303 | |||
Master Fan
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 12,324
|
Gonna sound sacrilegious to say but I kind of found the Reeve films kind of dated and a bit cheesy in some parts. I liked Man of Steel because finally we got a Superman who wasn't afraid to throw a punch. I never understood the hate of Zod being killed when he died in Superman II and Superman killed him in that one. And a hardcore comic fan would know he has killed in the comis before when left with no other option.
__________________
-James-
"All our dreams can come true, if we have the courage to pursue them." - Walt Disney Fan of : Game of Thrones, DC Comics, Star Wars, Doctor Who, Marvel Comics, The Walking Dead, Stranger Things, Black Sails & Vikings. |
|||
|
#304 | |||
Fan Forum Legend
|
Quote:
I think the problem people had with Superman killing Zod in Man of Steel is that it wasn't set up properly. That scene was added at the last minute by screenwriter David Goyer because he wanted a more dramatic ending. Originally, Zod was supposed to get sucked into the Phantom Zone with the other Kryptonians at the end. But when Goyer changed the ending and had Superman kill Zod, the rest of the script wasn't touched up to address that. You really don't have any idea what Clark's morals are earlier in the film, and there's really no reason given as to why he would feel so terrible after snapping Zod's neck. If they had better shown Clark's moral code early on, and showed how killing someone would be against everything he believes in(like they did with Bruce Wayne in Batman Begins) then that would make more sense leading into Clark's moral code being challenged at the end. But again, Clark doesn't seem to think of the safety of all the innocent bystanders during his fight with Zod and the others, and acts quite recklessly most of the time. So why does he feel so bad about killing Zod? And if he has some moral code, where was that code when all those people were avoiding all that falling debris during the battle? Wouldn't Superman be more cautious knowing how much damage their fight could cause? So basically it's not so much the depiction of what Superman does, so much as why he does or does not do certain things. Basically, the writing was the biggest problem with Man of Steel, as well as the haphazard directing of Zack Snyder, who doesn't seem to understand subtlety and storytelling rhythm. __________________
In Loving Memory of Christine Dettloff(cheekymonkey503). Rest In Peace, Dear Cheekymonkey. ~ Alex |
|||
|
#305 | |||
Elite Fan
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 42,839
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
|||
|
#306 | |||
I am a basketball genius!
|
Hey guys! We're over 300 posts, so am closing this thread & starting a new 1.
__________________
|
|||
Bookmarks |
Forum Affiliates | |
Thread Tools | |
|