Fan Forum
Remember Me?
Register

  New Forum Poll (Vote Here)   |     Summer TV Shows Poll (Vote Here)   |     Request a Forum   |     View New Forums

Reply   Post New Thread
 
Thread Tools
Old 11-08-2007, 09:55 AM
  #1
Master Fan

 
elisheva's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 12,871
New study casts doubt on abstinence-only programs

Quote:
Study: Abstinence-only programs aren't certain to curb teen sex

Including birth control in lessons to curb teen sex draws criticism

12:00 AM CST on Thursday, November 8, 2007

By ROBERT T. GARRETT / The Dallas Morning News
rtgarrett@dallasnews.com

AUSTIN – Just teaching abstinence remains unproven as a way to stop teen sex, while programs that both discuss contraceptives and urge teens to wait have better track records, a leading sex education researcher said Wednesday.

Even as a bill to continue funding abstinence-only instruction moves forward in Congress, researcher Douglas Kirby said that only a couple of programs that exclusively focus on abstinence have yielded even "modestly encouraging results."

However, many studies have shown that combining the abstinence message with explicit discussions of birth control "is a realistic, effective approach that does not appear to confuse young people," Dr. Kirby said in a report for a nonpartisan group that tries to reduce teen pregnancies.

In Texas, which leads the nation in teen births, backers of the more comprehensive approach applauded the study, but a social conservative was quick to denounce it as "faulty science."

Kyleen Wright of Mansfield, president of the Irving-based Texans for Life Coalition, said that contraception instruction was tried in the schools in the 1980s and didn't work.

"Now, we see a new spin, all these new attacks on abstinence ... trying to discourage parents from supporting what they feel in their gut is right for their children," she said.

Ms. Wright said the release of the report was timed to sway Congress to end federal funding of abstinence education.

Dr. Kirby denied that.

On Tuesday, the House passed a spending bill that would spend $141 million on community-based abstinence education, the level requested by President Bush. Though the Senate approved a smaller amount, proponents of more comprehensive sex education in the schools and wider availability of birth control for teens are unhappy the Democratic Congress hasn't killed the program.


On Wednesday, Planned Parenthood, the nation's largest network of sex education providers, called on Congress to stop funding programs that focus solely on abstinence. It pointed to the Kirby report as "definitively showing" that the programs don't work.

"As the mother of two teenagers, I want my kids to be taught about abstinence, but I also know that that's not enough," said Cecile Richards, the president of the Planned Parenthood Federation of America who is formerly of Austin and the daughter of former Texas Gov. Ann Richards.

In the report, which was based on a review of 115 studies of teenager sexual behavior, Dr. Kirby said abstinence-alone instruction is largely unproven, though he shied away from a sweeping denunciation.

Dr. Kirby, who for decades has evaluated sex-education programs for the government and other groups, conducted the review for the nonpartisan National Campaign to Prevent Teen and Unplanned Pregnancy.

He said two studies had found "weak but encouraging results" from abstinence programs in Ohio and Arkansas. However, he said more efforts to duplicate and study them are needed.

In April, Mathematica Policy Research released a report that was nine years and $8 million in the making. Scientists followed middle school children enrolled in four separate abstinence programs for about five years, and found no difference in the age of first intercourse between them and their peers.

In his review, Dr. Kirby said, "Two-thirds of the 48 comprehensive programs that supported both abstinence and the use of condoms and contraceptives for sexually active teens had positive behavioral effects," such as delaying the start of sexual activity and increasing use of condoms or other birth control.

He found no evidence that supplying youngsters with a dual message – explaining details about birth control and urging that they wait to have sex – "hastened the initiation of sex or increased the frequency of sex."


Dr. Janet Realini, a San Antonio public health official who supports more comprehensive instruction, hailed the study's other findings, such as that programs in which teens do community service or get one-on-one counseling can reduce teen pregnancy.

"There are some new, promising results on programs for parents," she said.
This just seems like common sense to me.
__________________
(i do not know what it is about you that closes
and opens;only something in me understands
the voice of your eyes is deeper than all roses)
e. e. cummings - somewhere i have never traveled
elisheva is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2007, 10:14 AM
  #2
Elite Fan

 
sunnykerr's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 45,153
You don't say, huh?

I'm sorry, I don't mean to disparage. Obviously, up to a certain point, abstinence is absolutely the way to go. But come on. There's a reason everybody says information is the most powerful weapon. And, in my experience anyway, just because people talk about safe sex doesn't mean they have sex earlier.

Heck, my mum brought a condom demonstration package (you know, the banana and the literature) home when I was ten. Which, by the way, would have made my brother eight at the time. And she showed us the whole thing. And she kept talking about it... well, quite frankly, to this day. Not every time we see her, obviously, but it pops up in conversation. And, believe me, I know, neither one of us had sex at thirteen just because our mum mentioned safe sex when we were very young.

Now, obviously, eight and ten is on the young side to start that kind of education. My mum is a nurse, so it wasn't anything all that odd for us. She's always been about the health.

I'm just saying that there would be a lot less teenage pregnancies if people told teens the realities of sex. There would probably a lot less teenage STDs, come to that.
__________________
Sunny
"The work goes on, the cause endures, the hope still lives, and the dream shall never die."
avie by Jessie
sunnykerr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2007, 11:08 AM
  #3
Master Fan

 
elisheva's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 12,871
Urgh, the FF goblin ate my post. But yeah, I agree. I didn't get much sex ed in school, so I learned the stuff on my own. But I think most people don't do that.

And if you talk to teenagers, you realize that people really know very little a lot of the time. The things some kids believe about sex and pregnancy! "You can't get pregnant if...." - and they think the most ridiculous things (if you rinse with soda pop, if you do it in a pool, if you have sex standing up, if it's your first time). So yeah, high schools need to teach this. Because when it comes to the point when kids make that choice, they need to be informed. Assuming they won't ever make the choice until they're married etc (and even then you still need to know this!!) is just blind and destructive.
__________________
(i do not know what it is about you that closes
and opens;only something in me understands
the voice of your eyes is deeper than all roses)
e. e. cummings - somewhere i have never traveled
elisheva is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2007, 09:38 PM
  #4
Elite Fan

 
sunnykerr's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 45,153
The one that gets to me is the whole "oral sex isn't sex" thing. Like you can't get STDs from doing that, or it doesn't count or whatever.

And it's so clear that abstinence-only education doesn't work. Unless we're talking polygamist regions and Menonites, have you honestly ever heard of a place in this world where teaching abstinence only has actually translated into zero teenage pregnancies? It doesn't work.
__________________
Sunny
"The work goes on, the cause endures, the hope still lives, and the dream shall never die."
avie by Jessie
sunnykerr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-10-2007, 05:18 AM
  #5
Elite Fan

 
spent cigarette's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 26,821
Abstinence-only programs are extremely outdated, to be perfectly honest I didn't even think we taught it in schools anymore. I've been out of high school for three years now, but when I did sex-ed it was very practical and open-minded, which I appreciated then and appreciate even more now. We learnt about STDs, about how "no means no", etc etc. But we also received free condoms, were taught how to put them on a "banana penis", how you can tell when it breaks, and in Year 10 were given brief rundowns on the different Pills available to us and the different side-effects that came with each.

Then again, I am from Australia. Maybe things are more conservative in the US. Here our teachers emphasised the fact that they weren't there to stand at the front of the classroom and preach to us the evils of sex, drugs, alcohol, etc. Their duty was to present us with the information necessary to make informed decisions. Rather than watch “scare videos” on how Sally Sue had three beers at a party and was found dead the next morning, we were taught how to recognise the signs of a spiked drink, and what we should do to avoid it happening to us. We were taught about “standard drinks”, how the body digests alcohol and how we should “know our limit” when out partying. The focus was less on “Don’t do it” and more on “Do it safely” and I think us students benefited greatly from that.

Frankly, I don't think we need to be urging kids to "wait" until marriage -- that's a moral expectation that IMO a school has no right to inforce. School exists to inform and enlighten, it should merely provide kids with the necessary information and then say "You know enough to now make your own informed decisions. Whether you now choose to have sex or not is entirely up to you, but we're here to make sure that when you do make the decision to sleep with your partner, be it tomorrow or in thirty years, you know all you need to know and can practice sex safely and happily."
__________________
and i don't want the world to see me cause i don't think that they'd understand
when everything's made to be broken i just want you to know who i am
spent cigarette is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-2007, 05:30 AM
  #6
Elite Fan

 
fetch's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 38,896
Quote:
Originally Posted by sunnykerr (View Post)
You don't say, huh?

I'm sorry, I don't mean to disparage. Obviously, up to a certain point, abstinence is absolutely the way to go. But come on. There's a reason everybody says information is the most powerful weapon. And, in my experience anyway, just because people talk about safe sex doesn't mean they have sex earlier.

Heck, my mum brought a condom demonstration package (you know, the banana and the literature) home when I was ten. Which, by the way, would have made my brother eight at the time. And she showed us the whole thing. And she kept talking about it... well, quite frankly, to this day. Not every time we see her, obviously, but it pops up in conversation. And, believe me, I know, neither one of us had sex at thirteen just because our mum mentioned safe sex when we were very young.

Now, obviously, eight and ten is on the young side to start that kind of education. My mum is a nurse, so it wasn't anything all that odd for us. She's always been about the health.

I'm just saying that there would be a lot less teenage pregnancies if people told teens the realities of sex. There would probably a lot less teenage STDs, come to that.

Exactly. I mean, learning about condoms isn't the biggest turn-on. It's not like you get out of class and say "all right, who wnats to go to the bushes with me?"
People will have sex. At 13 or at 21 or before or after. I have friends who lost their virginity in high school and I have friends who at 20 are still virgins.
__________________
fetch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-2007, 01:02 PM
  #7
Master Fan

 
elisheva's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 12,871
Quote:
Exactly. I mean, learning about condoms isn't the biggest turn-on. It's not like you get out of class and say "all right, who wnats to go to the bushes with me?"
True. I can't imagine having your sex ed/moral ed teacher explain how condoms can prevent STDs suddenly makes kids go "OMG SEX? I NEVER THOUGHT OF THAT! COOL!"
__________________
(i do not know what it is about you that closes
and opens;only something in me understands
the voice of your eyes is deeper than all roses)
e. e. cummings - somewhere i have never traveled
elisheva is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2007, 10:08 AM
  #8
Elite Fan

 
fetch's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 38,896
Quote:
Originally Posted by elisheva (View Post)
True. I can't imagine having your sex ed/moral ed teacher explain how condoms can prevent STDs suddenly makes kids go "OMG SEX? I NEVER THOUGHT OF THAT! COOL!"
Nothing like learning about disease to get you hot
__________________
fetch is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply   Post New Thread

Bookmarks


Thread Tools



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:16 PM.

Fan Forum  |  Contact Us  |  Fan Forum on Twitter  |  Fan Forum on Facebook  |  Archive  |  Top

Powered by vBulletin, Copyright © 2000-2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.5.2
Copyright © 1998-2012, Fan Forum.