| #1 | |||
| Loyal Fan ![]() ![]() ![]() Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 1,858
| New England states making more, giving less This was in our local paper today... New England states making more, giving less Wednesday, November 10, 2004 2:00 PM CST HARTFORD, Conn. (AP) - Residents of Connecticut and its New England neighbors continue to earn more and give back less, according to an annual index of charitable giving. Connecticut ranks first when it comes to making money, but joins New Hampshire, Massachusetts and Rhode Island in falling to the very bottom of the 2004 Generosity Index, according to the Catalogue for Philanthropy. Mississippi held onto its title as the most giving state for the eighth consecutive year. Following right behind are Arkansas, Oklahoma, Louisiana, Alabama and Tennessee. The survey is based on the average adjusted income of residents and the value of itemized charitable donations reported on 2002 federal tax returns, the latest year available. New England's stinginess is nothing new. New Hampshire has been labeled the least generous state for six out of the last eight years, with only Massachusetts stealing the title in 1998 and 1999. While the Nutmeg State has the nation's highest average adjusted gross income at $64,724, its residents donate $175 less to charity than the national average. That ranks Connecticut at 44th on the Generosity Index, a slip of seven places from last year. Carol Schofield, of the Connecticut Council for Philanthropy, said she's disappointed to see where Connecticut ranks, but defends the state's charity work. Factors, such as the aftermath of Sept. 11 in 2001 and a slow economy, may influence how much people are willing to donate, she said. The index does not take into account non-itemized giving or volunteering, Schofield added. Still, Schofield said she couldn't offer a solid explanation as to why Connecticut and the rest of New England has earned such a miserly reputation. "Old New Englanders are just perhaps a little more reluctant ... a little more reluctant to give or a little more reluctant to get credit for it," Schofield said. The latest index reflects a country still coping with an economic slump. The national average gross income in 2002 dropped nearly 2.4 percent to $45,953. Despite the drop in income, the average individual donation fell less than 1 percent. Exceptions to the trend can be found in Connecticut, Massachusetts and Vermont, where the decline in giving exceeded the decline in income. In Connecticut, income fell 5 percent and giving dropped almost 8 percent, the sharpest decline among the six New England states. Rhode Island residents, however, saw their income drop by .14 percent, but increased giving by 2.5 percent. Southern and Midwestern states, again, top off the generosity index. The region's high generosity level has been attributed to the practice of tithing, or giving a tenth of one's earnings to the church. Mississippi consistently earns its place as No. 1 on the list by generating the greatest disparity among the states in income and charitable contributions. It is ranked as the poorest state in the nation, but comes in fifth on the index for its "giving" rank. The average itemized filer in Mississippi reported $4,484 in donations in 2002. That beats the national average by $1,029. Although critics accuse the generosity index of shaming states into giving more, officials at The Catalogue for Philanthropy say the survey is a way of comparison. The Boston, Mass.-based nonprofit group created the index eight years ago. "Generosity is really what you give as a function of what you have," said spokesman Martin Cohn. | |||
| | Reply With Quote |
| #2 | |||
| Extreme Fan ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 2,699
| Not surprising -- Southern hospitality and all that. ![]() The South gets a bad rap and a lot of very negative stereotypes placed on them...nice to see something positive for a change. -[-*colormist*-]- __________________ Jessica: During Tess' and my integration, if she comes out and comes running into your arms, do you promise not to let her run off with you? Nash: Jessica, I want you to get better. I do. But, hey, I mean, if you and Tess are integrated, maybe -- maybe you'll be running off with me, too. | |||
| | Reply With Quote |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| |