News & Politics - Fall of the Republic

ericdubay · 10-22-2009, 11:41 PM

Alex Jones' masterpiece documentary Fall of the Republic: The Presidency of Barack Obama came out yesterday. Please, for yourselves and for humanity, watch this film - it contains some of the most important, pertinent information to understanding what's happening in our world today. Follow this link:

The Atlantean Conspiracy: Fall of the Republic - The Presidency of Barack Obama

Fall Of The Republic documents how an offshore corporate cartel is bankrupting the US economy by design. Leaders are now declaring that world government has arrived and that the dollar will be replaced by a new global currency. President Obama has brazenly violated Article 1 Section 9 of the US Constitution by seating himself at the head of United Nations' Security Council, thus becoming the first US president to chair the world body. A scientific dictatorship is in its final stages of completion, and laws protecting basic human rights are being abolished worldwide; an iron curtain of high-tech tyranny is now descending over the planet. A worldwide regime controlled by an unelected corporate elite is implementing a planetary carbon tax system that will dominate all human activity and establish a system of neo-feudal slavery. The image makers have carefully packaged Obama as the world's savior; he is the Trojan Horse manufactured to pacify the people just long enough for the globalists to complete their master plan. This film reveals the architecture of the New World Order and what the power elite have in store for humanity. More importantly it communicates how We The People can retake control of our government, turn the criminal tide and bring the tyrants to justice.

~Eric
The Atlantean Conspiracy

**TheAngel** · 10-23-2009, 07:05 AM

But there is absolutely nothing in Article One, Section Nine of the US Constitution that stops a US president from sitting at the head of the UN Security Council. Here is the full text of Article One, Section Nine

Quote:

Section 9 - Limits on Congress

The Migration or Importation of such Persons as any of the States now existing shall think proper to admit, shall not be prohibited by the Congress prior to the Year one thousand eight hundred and eight, but a tax or duty may be imposed on such Importation, not exceeding ten dollars for each Person.

The privilege of the Writ of Habeas Corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in Cases of Rebellion or Invasion the public Safety may require it.

No Bill of Attainder or ex post facto Law shall be passed.

(No capitation, or other direct, Tax shall be laid, unless in Proportion to the Census or Enumeration herein before directed to be taken.) (Section in parentheses clarified by the 16th Amendment.)

No Tax or Duty shall be laid on Articles exported from any State.

No Preference shall be given by any Regulation of Commerce or Revenue to the Ports of one State over those of another: nor shall Vessels bound to, or from, one State, be obliged to enter, clear, or pay Duties in another.

No Money shall be drawn from the Treasury, but in Consequence of Appropriations made by Law; and a regular Statement and Account of the Receipts and Expenditures of all public Money shall be published from time to time.

No Title of Nobility shall be granted by the United States: And no Person holding any Office of Profit or Trust under them, shall, without the Consent of the Congress, accept of any present, Emolument, Office, or Title, of any kind whatever, from any King, Prince or foreign State.

Besides, there's also the fact that the constitution of the united states, and Article One, Section Nine, was ratified in 1787, long before the UN existed. Your conspiracy theories are amusing, but that's all they really are.

ceilirose · 10-23-2009, 08:20 AM

Mr. Jones will increase the size of his bank accounts with his latest piece of "work." Nothing more, nothing less. He can live behind a walled villa like Limbaugh and - as the saying goes - laugh his way to the bank.

**TheAngel** · 10-23-2009, 08:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ceilirose (View Post)

Mr. Jones will increase the size of his bank accounts with his latest piece of "work." Nothing more, nothing less. He can live behind a walled villa like Limbaugh and - as the saying goes - laugh his way to the bank.

See, I really don't see the problem with a world economy. A lot of countries were afraid of the Euro, and honestly, at least from what I've seen, it's been fairly effective in being pretty good for Europe's economy. Now, admittedly, I'm not a European citizen, and I don't really remember what Europe was like before the Euro, since I was really young when it came into being, but I've not heard much complaining. The idea that the US should remain isolationist regarding economics and politics is ridiculous in our new global economy. I also don't really know how our rights are being "abolished worldwide" since the new global age of technology has given more power to the freedom of speech than ever before. If your "friend" believes that there's a huge government conspiracy that's going to take over the world, wouldn't they be pulling his video off the internet in order to keep him from speaking out about it?

**sunnykerr** · 10-26-2009, 07:13 PM

A global economy isn't without its issues. For instance, there are countries whose business practices are absolutely appalling yet gain political legitimacy through their sheer market size. If we're doing business with everyone on an equal footing, some very troubling manufacturing practices will run the risk of being overlooked.

However, the American policy of isolationism is ludicrous and has never worked. Any modern economy depends as much on exports as it does on domestic business. We are already at a form of global economic interdependence. Heck, we need only to look at the crash of '29 to see how interconnected we've all been for a very long time.