Fan Forum
Remember Me?
Register

  New Forum Poll (Vote Here)   |     Summer TV Shows Poll (Vote Here)   |     Request a Forum   |     View New Forums

Reply   Post New Thread
 
Thread Tools
Old 11-30-2004, 12:55 AM
  #1
Part-Time Fan
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 151
Courts Allow Schools to Ban Military Recruiters

Quote:
]Court Allows Universities to Bar Military Recruiters
By ADAM LIPTAK

Published: November 29, 2004

Universities may bar military recruiters from their campuses without risking the loss of federal money, a federal appeals court in Philadelphia ruled today.

The suit was brought by an association of law schools and a group representing hundreds of legal scholars seeking to help universities and colleges that want to keep military recruiters off their campuses because they object to the Defense Department's policy of excluding gay men and lesbians from military service.

A 1995 law, known as the Solomon Amendment, bars the federal government from disbursing money to colleges and universities that obstruct campus recruiting by the military. As amended and interpreted over the years, the law prohibits disbursements to all parts of a university, including its physics department and medical school, if any of its units, like its law school, make military recruiting even a little more difficult.

Billions of dollars are at stake, and no university has been willing to defy the government. Indeed, several of the law schools that are members of the Forum for Academic and Institutional Rights, the group that sued to block the new law, have not been publicly identified.

Among the institutions willing to be named are the law schools of New York University and George Washington University. The law faculties of Stanford, Georgetown and several other law schools are also members of the group.

E. Joshua Rosenkranz, who represents the plaintiffs in the suit, said the reluctance of several of his law school clients to be identified publicly was driven by fear.

"They don't want retribution that is exacted behind closed doors by faceless bureaucrats and vindictive politicians," Mr. Rosenkranz said.

The 2-to-1 decision in Philadelphia today, by the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, said the law violates the schools' First Amendment rights in two ways.

Citing a 2000 decision of the United States Supreme Court that said the Boy Scouts have a First Amendment right to exclude gay scoutmasters, the appeals court said the law schools have a First Amendment right to convey a message opposing discrimination against gays by excluding military recruiters.

The appeals court also said that the presence of military recruiters on campus forces universities to convey a message with which they disagree. That is a form of compelled speech, the court said, prohibited by the First Amendment.

The dissenting judge said that the majority had not given enough weight to the importance of unfettered military recruiting, adding that the law does not stop schools from criticizing the military's policies and so does not violate the First Amendment.

A spokesman for the Justice Department, Mark Corallo, said, "The department is reviewing the decision and will determine what action we will take after a thorough review." The government can ask the full appeals court to review the three-judge panel's decision or ask the Supreme Court to hear the case. In either case, the government may also ask for a stay of the decision.

In the meantime, Mr. Rosenkranz said, colleges and universities are free to limit military recruiters' access to their campuses.

"Now every academic institution in the country is free to follow their consciences and their nondiscrimination policies," Mr. Rosenkranz said. "Enlightened institutions have a First Amendment right to exclude bigots. In a free society, the government cannot co-opt private institutions to issue the government's message."
__________________
~beth~

VOTE -- Democracy is not a spectator sport!
mildew is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-30-2004, 04:49 AM
  #2
Loyal Fan
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 1,697
Thanks for posting this story. I googled the reporter's name, and found that it's published in the New York Times for 11/30.

Colleges Can Bar Army Recruiters

edited: I just realized the articles aren't quite the same, though they're both by Adam Liptak. The NYT one is longer, and has more quotes from the dissenting judge and opponents of the ruling. The NYT site requires registration (privacy buffs check out bugmenot.com).

Last edited by pixiedude; 11-30-2004 at 04:57 AM.
pixiedude is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply   Post New Thread

Bookmarks


Thread Tools



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:34 AM.

Fan Forum  |  Contact Us  |  Fan Forum on Twitter  |  Fan Forum on Facebook  |  Archive  |  Top

Powered by vBulletin, Copyright © 2000-2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.5.2
Copyright © 1998-2012, Fan Forum.