Fan Forum
Remember Me?
Register

  New Forum Poll (Vote Here)   |     Summer TV Shows Poll (Vote Here)   |     Request a Forum   |     View New Forums

Reply   Post New Thread
 
Thread Tools
Old 08-19-2004, 02:55 PM
  #1
Passionate Fan

 
mh67511's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,663
Colorado weighs proportional electoral votes

Quote:
DENVER (AP) - A plan to scrap the winner-take-all system of allocating electoral votes in Colorado is heading to the ballot in November. If passed, Amendment 36 would make Colorado the first state to allocate electoral votes proportionately according to the popular vote, rather than giving a winner all of the state's electoral votes.

Secretary of State Donetta Davidson said Friday that supporters have gathered enough signatures to put the measure on the November ballot.

If the proposal had been in place four years ago, Democrat Al Gore would have earned enough electoral votes to go to the White House.

Only two other states do not have winner-take-all systems of casting electoral college votes. Nebraska and Maine give two votes to the winner of each state, and remaining votes are cast to show who won each congressional district.

Republican Gov. Bill Owens and Republican State Party Chairman Ted Halaby have criticized the Colorado proposal, saying it would lessen the state's clout in presidential elections. They warn that candidates will ignore the state and its nine electoral votes if the measure passes.

Julie Brown, campaign director for the Make Your Vote Count effort that supports the measure, dismissed their concerns.

"It begs the question on which is more important - a two-hour presidential stop at a tarmac at Denver International Airport or true representation by the voters."

Katy Atkinson, a spokeswoman for the opposing Coloradans Against a Really Stupid Idea, promised to challenge the measure if it passes and it is applied in this year's presidential race.

The proposal's backers want it to take effect immediately, before Colorado's electoral votes are cast in December.

"They are ripe for a court challenge on this," Atkinson said. "If this is a close race like the one four years ago, we could be thrown into a situation where we are the Florida of 2004. We'd be the laughing stock of the country. All those Florida jokes would be applied to Colorado."

State Sen. Ron Tupa, D-Boulder, tried unsuccessfully in 2001 to change Colorado's electoral system. He said the new ballot initiative is a good idea.

"It will give voters the unique opportunity to reform an outdated electoral system that disenfranchises hundreds of thousands of Colorado voters," he said.
I LOVE this idea!

I live in NE too and didn't realize they did that system of giving the winner 2 votes and dividing the rest. I really like that idea. I wonder, have Nebraska or Maine ever had problems with their systems?

The problem with the current system is that, if you don't vote with the majority in your state, your vote basically doesn't matter.
mh67511 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-19-2004, 03:30 PM
  #2
Master Fan

 
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 14,230
Exactly. Proportional representation is used all over the world and with great success (take THAT Ms. Atkinson), and nobody laughs at those countries for having that type of system or when there are problems associated with it. And even if there are problems, is she and her seemingly Republican friends so afraid of an actual representation of democracy that they're willing to stay put with an antique and outdated, winner gets all mode of democracy just to ensure that they'd win the White House? THAT'S something to be embarassed of, not the other way around. Generally, there are some somewhat okay arguments that can be made against proportional representation, but Ms. Atkison nor Mr. Owens or Mr. Halaby have presented them. "They warn that candidates will ignore the state and its nine electoral votes if the measure passes."?! ...I've heard better excuses made by grade 8ers than that.
Timeo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-19-2004, 08:24 PM
  #3
Loyal Fan
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,686
I absolutely LOVE this idea. Speaking in terms of national elections (because EVERY vote makes a REALLY big difference at the state and local level) - people, particularly in states that almost always vote the same party, often feel like their vote doesn't make much of a difference. Not only that but candidates sometimes ignore states or take them for granted in their campaign travels because they trend one way or another.

This is the fair way to go - to ensure that everyone's vote is counted and that everyone is truly represented in the election.
summerbug is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply   Post New Thread

Bookmarks


Thread Tools



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:32 PM.

Fan Forum  |  Contact Us  |  Fan Forum on Twitter  |  Fan Forum on Facebook  |  Archive  |  Top

Powered by vBulletin, Copyright © 2000-2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.5.2
Copyright © 1998-2012, Fan Forum.