 | | 04-19-2004, 06:18 PM | |
#4 |
| Master Fan
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 12,829
| Posted by bugs8674 : Quote:
Reasons Huh, well ok:
1. you will have chaos break out eventully, so what if canada has allowed gay marriage, there may not be choas yet,because its a small sector that allows gay marriages. After you have increased the poplution of the world, by allowing gay marriage, then you will see chaos evolving.
2. Religion is a big thing to some people, but some people can't take it mentally, so if gay marraiges come about, it is agaisnt the word of god....Then you have people killing gay people who are married.
3. There will be less controll in the government, because the public and the world will break out to do what they please
|
Gee, that's 12 years old talking.
1. Check the posts in the last thread. Europe has already allowed homosexuals to get married. There has been no chaos and even religious people who were against it at first admitted that it harmed no one. Plus, since two gays can't have children, how can they 'increase' the population of the world? Do I need to explain to you why they can't have children or do you remember your biology classes?
2. If people can't take it mentally, that's a mental institution that they need. And if they start killing people, then it's jail. If everyone has to get to kill the people they don't like or disagree with, I'm sure, no one on this planet would have survived and the posters of this board would be gone first.
3. No they would not. Goverment has to make the law enforced. Remember how controversial certain laws that gave rights to Black people were in the 60's? Lots of people were against it, and yet the government wasn't overthrown. The 'world' would not break out because there's a minority of insane people who would kill or harm gays that are allowed a right. And I thought you guys weren't against homosexuals but 'homosexual acts' (dixit the other poster)?
And excuse me, but if the US can play GI Joe in Iraq and other countries of the world and not keep its people sane over a law, then I don't know what to think of your 'democracy'.
[ 04-19-2004: Message edited StellaSlight ] __________________ The difference between 'involvement' and 'commitment' is like an eggs-and-ham breakfast : the chicken was 'involved' - the pig was 'committed' |
| Reply With Quote |