 | | 04-21-2004, 06:48 AM |
|
#5 |
| Master Fan
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 12,829
| Quote:
Originally posted by Timeo:
<STRONG>Heh. Am I the only one who finds this vaguely amusing? I mean this guy set up a meeting with a woman who wanted to be "raped" and he burst into another woman's house instead.</STRONG>
| Actually I think I would consider it vaguely amusing too, had the woman not been traumatized by it. Apparently, he hit and struggled her, so it's definately a sobering thing.
Quote: |
And in that case, would it even be considered rape?
| You mean, if two people who have that fantasy about rape would perform a real one? I guess it depends on the question of the consentement at the time the sexual act is done. A court would probably determined if the woman agreed to the sexual act, even if she had said on a chatroom that she'd like to be raped. But it's damn hard to tell, all the context is related to a 'real' rape : the man enters into the woman's house without warning, hits , strangles, take her savagely etc... and if the woman says no, and struggles, who's to say that it wasn't to add to the fantasy, since she's supposed to play the role of the raped woman? __________________ The difference between 'involvement' and 'commitment' is like an eggs-and-ham breakfast : the chicken was 'involved' - the pig was 'committed' |
| Reply With Quote |