 | | 04-11-2004, 01:22 PM | |
#27 |
| Master Fan
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 14,069
| Quote:
Originally posted by ceilirose:
<STRONG>Abducted Bookworm - All I can say is that I consider it unfortunate that someone who can express his position so well can't be broadminded enough to accept a position critical of theirs without resorting to name-calling. That's basically what's happening here. You can spin it anyway you want but you called someone not supporting Bush guilty of being anti-Semitic and anti-American. You're wrong on both counts. Your explanation of the motives behind those who disagree with Bush is just a very right wing radical sentiment. It should anger those who are true moderates..not those in name only.
I've been called names more numerous to recount here by posters on this board who disagree with my opinion. If you think it just happens to people who have Conservative or Repuplican views you're dead wrong and need to take another look at what's happening here.
Other than that I really don't have anything more to say to you on this subject.
[ 04-11-2004: Message edited ceilirose ]</STRONG>
| "critical" "not supporting Bush" "disagree with Bush" Fine. But that isn't what's being discussed.
Please stop misrepresenting my posts.
Claiming that Bush knew in advance of September 11th is absurd and calculated to incite anti-Americanism. That is what I said. Repeatedly. Very clearly.
There are moderates who are critical - even most of those who are supporters of President Bush are critical of his policy on something. But there's a difference between being critical, disagreeing, opposing etc. and the kind of comment that has been made, and which I'm objecting to. __________________ The Universal Friendship League? Could it sound any creepier? |
| Reply With Quote |