 | | 09-15-2008, 12:50 AM |
|
#15 |
| Master Fan
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 22,258
| Quote: | I stand by my 'Josh hates jocks that's why Dan Humphrey is always going to win against Nate Archibald although in real life that normally isn't the case' theory. | Nikki, I share the same theory. 
That's why I pick Mark over Josh. Because Mark delves deeper into individual characters and breaks down cliches. In OTH, we were introduced to the se characters who were, basically, jocks and cheerleaders... normally people that are deemed uninteresting without their good looks - but he turned all that around and made them such complex characters that inspired millions of teenagers in America as well as the whole world to think outside the box and screw stratification.
I was hoping Josh would go down the same route... he did a bit in The OC before things got effed up and I was hoping he was gonna do it here in GG but, so far, I cannot see growth in these characters.  They're exactly who they are labeled to be - and their labels are glamorous and all but it gets boring without proper growth.  __________________ nathaniel&serena • harry&hermione
if you're lost, you can look and you will find me. time after time. |
| |