 | | 08-26-2008, 06:12 PM |
|
#5 |
| Master Fan
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 20,391
| Quote: | There's a demand for better security yet there's no talk of improving salaries for law enforcement and so forth. So, why should security guards and police officers make any more of an effort to protect people if they're undervalued? In schools, tons of security guards were fired due to budget cuts. That's not right. Who is going to protect where we work anymore? | I don't think it's a problem with security personel myself. Taking aside their very valid concerns over pay and, one would assume, work conditions, I still think that if the system they're meant to implement was clearer in its guidelines, better supported by the government and just generally more logical, there would be more security.
And I don't believe the absence of attack is any proof that security measures are working. An attack would certainly be a test to see if the measures were working. But there was an eight-year gap between the 1993 and the 2001 attacks on the World Trade Centre. Does that mean that the measures were all fine and well during that time since there were no other attacks? __________________  Sunny
"The work goes on, the cause endures, the hope still lives, and the dream shall never die." avie by Jessie |
| Reply With Quote |