View Single Post
Old 07-31-2008, 04:14 AM
  #10
sum1
Master Fan

 
sum1's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 11,554
Quote:
Originally Posted by sunnykerr (View Post)
I think we're all well aware of that.
If you look at the posts on this page I don't think that's necessarily the case. I think some people at least are very clearly not aware and are treating the cover as if it was meant at face value.

Quote:
Originally Posted by sunnykerr (View Post)
What we're addressing is whether it went down that way or not.
I don't think that's necessarily what everybody thought they were discussing.

Quote:
Originally Posted by sunnykerr (View Post)
Well, which is it? We should be bothered by attacks based on prejudice or we shouldn't be?
I really don't get what you're trying to say. I made it pretty clear that attacking somebody on basis of ageism is something people should be bothered about. I never said anything to indicate that people shouldn't be bothered by somebody being attacked on basis of prejudice. It might be noted that in those covers there was no actual attack on Obama, just a mockery of attacks on Obama. I think it was in bad taste to do a satire like that, but I know it wasn't supposed to be an actual prejudiced attack on him.
__________________
Free Tibet. And Iran. And Zimbabwe.

Last edited by sum1 : 07-31-2008 at 04:34 AM.
sum1 is offline   Reply With Quote